PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWMC vs. OUSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWMC vs. OUSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EWMC having a 7.11% return and OUSM slightly lower at 6.80%.


EWMC

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.30%
YTD
7.11%
6M
6.51%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
10.99%

OUSM

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.69%
YTD
6.80%
6M
6.94%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWMC vs. OUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
7.11%7.81%15.67%18.79%-11.63%26.35%15.60%23.05%-12.45%13.05%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
6.80%2.17%13.45%18.82%-7.89%21.45%7.64%28.04%-10.60%10.85%

Correlation

The correlation between EWMC and OUSM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.91

The correlation between EWMC and OUSM shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWMC vs. OUSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWMC
OUSM

Industrials

17.9%
22.8%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
19.3%

Financial Services

13.8%
21.1%

Technology

13.3%
13.5%

Healthcare

9.8%
9.2%

Real Estate

7.8%

-

Basic Materials

5.9%
1.4%

Energy

5.1%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.9%

Utilities

3.4%
3.9%

Communication Services

2.0%
3.8%

Industrials

EWMC
17.9%
OUSM
22.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EWMC
16.0%
OUSM
19.3%

Financial Services

EWMC
13.8%
OUSM
21.1%

Technology

EWMC
13.3%
OUSM
13.5%

Healthcare

EWMC
9.8%
OUSM
9.2%

Real Estate

EWMC
7.8%
OUSM

-

Basic Materials

EWMC
5.9%
OUSM
1.4%

Energy

EWMC
5.1%
OUSM
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

EWMC
5.0%
OUSM
4.9%

Utilities

EWMC
3.4%
OUSM
3.9%

Communication Services

EWMC
2.0%
OUSM
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWMC vs. OUSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWMC
EWMC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
EWMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
EWMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSM
OUSM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
OUSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSM Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWMC vs. OUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWMCOUSMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

0.83

+0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

1.34

+0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.15

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

1.19

+1.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.54

3.47

+5.07

EWMC vs. OUSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the OUSM Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWMC and OUSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWMCOUSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

0.83

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.46

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.48

+0.07

Drawdowns

EWMC vs. OUSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWMC drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than OUSM's maximum drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWMC and OUSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWMCOUSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-39.84%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-9.21%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.09%

-19.44%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

-19.44%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-1.67%

+1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-5.22%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

3.14%

-0.57%

Volatility

EWMC vs. OUSM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) have volatilities of 3.82% and 3.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWMCOUSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

3.66%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

9.25%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.13%

13.15%

+2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.90%

16.30%

+4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.25%

18.94%

+3.31%

EWMC vs. OUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWMC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSM's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWMC vs. OUSM - Dividend Comparison

EWMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than OUSM's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
0.96%1.19%0.95%0.96%1.28%0.92%1.16%1.25%1.50%1.14%1.00%1.43%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
2.07%2.09%1.62%1.64%1.98%1.55%2.02%1.99%2.63%2.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWMC and OUSM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWMC has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to OUSM (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWMC dropped -43.12% vs OUSM's -39.84%.

On 5-year performance, EWMC leads with 7.66% vs 7.39% for OUSM. On fees, EWMC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, OUSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EWMC has performed better with a 7.66% return vs 7.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWMC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSM.

OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.96% for EWMC.

EWMC tracks S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index, while OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EWMC and 0.48% for OUSM.

EWMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWMC and OUSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer