EWL vs. LVHD
EWL (iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF) and LVHD (Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWL is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Switzerland Index, while LVHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWL returned 10.14%/yr vs 8.41%/yr for LVHD. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for LVHD.
Performance
EWL vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWL achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 10.95% return. Over the past 10 years, EWL has outperformed LVHD with an annualized return of 10.14%, while LVHD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.41% annualized return.
EWL
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 6M
- 7.45%
- 1Y
- 13.57%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
LVHD
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 10.95%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 13.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
EWL vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF | 4.60% | 32.92% | -2.80% | 17.67% | -18.89% | 20.20% | 11.80% | 31.58% | -9.21% | 23.34% |
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 10.95% | 7.50% | 10.18% | -0.95% | -1.82% | 26.90% | -1.28% | 22.91% | -5.58% | 14.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWL and LVHD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015 | 0.53 |
The correlation between EWL and LVHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWL vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWL
LVHD
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Utilities
Energy
-
Healthcare
EWL
LVHD
Financial Services
EWL
LVHD
Consumer Defensive
EWL
LVHD
Industrials
EWL
LVHD
Basic Materials
EWL
LVHD
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWL
LVHD
Communication Services
EWL
LVHD
Real Estate
EWL
LVHD
Technology
EWL
LVHD
Utilities
EWL
LVHD
Energy
EWL
-
LVHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWL vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank
EWL
LVHD
EWL vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWL | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.23 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 2.16 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.24 | 5.43 | -2.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWL vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWL drawdown since its inception was -51.62%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWL and LVHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWL | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.62% | -37.32% | -14.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -6.17% | -7.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.48% | -14.29% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.99% | -16.75% | -12.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.99% | -37.32% | +8.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.63% | -1.07% | -2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.08% | -4.04% | -7.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 2.46% | +1.76% |
Volatility
EWL vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) at 3.54%. This indicates that EWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWL | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 3.54% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | 6.96% | +5.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.09% | 9.77% | +6.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 12.91% | +3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 15.52% | +0.95% |
EWL vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWL vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison
EWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than LVHD's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.21% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 1.73% | 1.45% | 1.85% | 2.56% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 2.58% |
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 3.27% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWL and LVHD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWL has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to LVHD (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWL dropped -51.62% vs LVHD's -37.32%.
On 10-year performance, EWL leads with 10.14% vs 8.41% for LVHD. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWL has performed better with a 10.14% return vs 8.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWL.
LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.63% for EWL.
EWL is categorized as Europe Equities, while LVHD is Dividend. EWL tracks MSCI Switzerland Index, while LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWL and 0.27% for LVHD.
LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWL and LVHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer