PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWJV vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWJV vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWJV achieves a 14.97% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.27% return.


EWJV

1D
0.27%
1M
6.48%
YTD
14.97%
6M
18.88%
1Y
36.33%
3Y*
24.24%
5Y*
13.51%
10Y*

TLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.81%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
-1.80%
5Y*
-6.31%
10Y*
-1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWJV vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EWJV
iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF
14.97%33.96%11.59%23.60%-6.02%5.48%2.41%10.48%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.27%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%14.04%

Correlation

The correlation between EWJV and TLT is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019

-0.02

The correlation between EWJV and TLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWJV vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWJV
EWJV Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
EWJV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWJV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWJV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
EWJV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWJV Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWJV vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWJVTLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.09

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

0.65

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.52

1.63

+5.89

EWJV vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWJV Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWJV and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWJVTLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

0.51

+1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

-0.40

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.26

+0.43

Drawdowns

EWJV vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWJV drawdown since its inception was -30.05%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJV and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWJVTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.05%

-48.35%

+18.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.74%

-7.58%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.74%

-19.18%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.39%

-43.70%

+18.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.99%

-40.44%

+36.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-13.82%

+7.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.85%

3.04%

+1.81%

Volatility

EWJV vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.76%. This indicates that EWJV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWJVTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

2.76%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.55%

6.50%

+8.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.22%

9.77%

+9.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.01%

15.87%

+2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

14.91%

+3.62%

EWJV vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EWJV and TLT have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EWJV vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

EWJV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than TLT's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWJV
iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF
4.66%5.35%4.10%3.32%2.71%2.46%1.96%4.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.59%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWJV and TLT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWJV has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to TLT (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWJV dropped -30.05% vs TLT's -48.35%.

On 5-year performance, EWJV leads with 13.51% vs -6.31% for TLT. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, TLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EWJV has performed better with a 13.51% return vs -6.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWJV and TLT have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

EWJV has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 4.59% for TLT.

EWJV is categorized as Japan Equities, while TLT is Government Bonds. EWJV tracks MSCI Japan Value Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index.

EWJV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWJV and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer