EWJV vs. BBJP
EWJV (iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF) and BBJP (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - EWJV tracks the MSCI Japan Value Index while BBJP tracks the Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EWJV returned 13.72%/yr vs 9.11%/yr for BBJP. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EWJV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BBJP.
Performance
EWJV vs. BBJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EWJV having a 14.66% return and BBJP slightly higher at 14.97%.
EWJV
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 5.90%
- YTD
- 14.66%
- 6M
- 18.25%
- 1Y
- 34.51%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
BBJP
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 14.97%
- 6M
- 16.98%
- 1Y
- 29.99%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- —
EWJV vs. BBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJV iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF | 14.66% | 33.96% | 11.59% | 23.60% | -6.02% | 5.48% | 2.41% | 10.48% |
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 14.97% | 26.55% | 7.47% | 20.65% | -17.24% | 1.21% | 15.42% | 13.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWJV and BBJP is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between EWJV and BBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWJV vs. BBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWJV
BBJP
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Financial Services
EWJV
BBJP
Industrials
EWJV
BBJP
Consumer Cyclical
EWJV
BBJP
Technology
EWJV
BBJP
Communication Services
EWJV
BBJP
Healthcare
EWJV
BBJP
Consumer Defensive
EWJV
BBJP
Real Estate
EWJV
BBJP
Energy
EWJV
BBJP
Basic Materials
EWJV
BBJP
Utilities
EWJV
BBJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWJV vs. BBJP — Risk / Return Rank
EWJV
BBJP
EWJV vs. BBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWJV | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 1.55 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.60 | 2.27 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.29 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 2.32 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.32 | 7.76 | -0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWJV | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.55 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.50 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.45 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
EWJV vs. BBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWJV drawdown since its inception was -30.05%, smaller than the maximum BBJP drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJV and BBJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWJV | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.05% | -32.66% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.74% | -13.60% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.74% | -14.49% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.39% | -32.66% | +7.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.25% | -1.19% | -3.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -8.53% | +2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 4.07% | +0.83% |
Volatility
EWJV vs. BBJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) is 4.00%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that EWJV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWJV | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 4.29% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.56% | 14.99% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.24% | 19.47% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 18.15% | -0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 18.29% | +0.24% |
EWJV vs. BBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWJV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BBJP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EWJV vs. BBJP - Dividend Comparison
EWJV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, which matches BBJP's 4.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 4.67% | 5.37% | 2.80% | 3.05% | 1.52% | 2.89% | 1.12% | 2.31% | 0.65% |
EWJV iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF | 4.67% | 5.35% | 4.10% | 3.32% | 2.71% | 2.46% | 1.96% | 4.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, EWJV and BBJP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BBJP has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to EWJV (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWJV dropped -30.05% vs BBJP's -32.66%.
On 5-year performance, EWJV leads with 13.72% vs 9.11% for BBJP. On fees, EWJV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EWJV has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EWJV has performed better with a 13.72% return vs 9.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWJV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBJP.
EWJV and BBJP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 4.67%.
EWJV tracks MSCI Japan Value Index, while BBJP tracks Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EWJV and 0.19% for BBJP.
EWJV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWJV and BBJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer