PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWJV vs. FLJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EWJV vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EWJV vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EWJV
iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF
8.43%33.96%11.59%23.60%-6.02%5.48%2.41%10.48%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
8.49%25.26%25.89%36.02%-2.75%12.68%10.65%11.97%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EWJV having a 8.43% return and FLJH slightly higher at 8.49%.


EWJV

1D
-1.26%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
8.43%
6M
13.99%
1Y
43.60%
3Y*
23.52%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*

FLJH

1D
-0.73%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
8.49%
6M
14.23%
1Y
48.78%
3Y*
28.30%
5Y*
18.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EWJV vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWJV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

EWJV vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWJV
EWJV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EWJV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWJV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWJV Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EWJV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWJV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJH
FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWJV vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWJVFLJHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

1.70

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

2.35

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

3.34

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.21

12.32

-3.12

EWJV vs. FLJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWJV Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWJV and FLJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWJVFLJHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.70

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.99

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.69

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between EWJV and FLJH is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EWJV vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

EWJV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, more than FLJH's 3.60% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWJV
iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF
4.94%5.35%4.10%3.32%2.71%2.46%1.96%4.29%0.00%0.00%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
3.60%3.90%5.06%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.10%

Drawdowns

EWJV vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWJV drawdown since its inception was -30.05%, roughly equal to the maximum FLJH drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJV and FLJH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EWJVFLJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.05%

-31.51%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.74%

-10.80%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.39%

-20.39%

-5.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.46%

-5.70%

-3.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-5.39%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

3.21%

+0.84%

Volatility

EWJV vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) at 7.61%. This indicates that EWJV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EWJVFLJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.03%

7.61%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.43%

14.50%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.71%

23.00%

-1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.93%

18.50%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.51%

19.90%

-1.39%