EWJV vs. GSIB

Last updated Jun 19, 2026

EWJV (iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF) and GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWJV is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Value Index, while GSIB is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. EWJV is passively managed, while GSIB is actively managed. Over the past year, EWJV returned 40.49% vs 49.03% for GSIB. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWJV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSIB.

Performance

EWJV vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EWJV having a 16.16% return and GSIB slightly lower at 15.97%.

EWJV

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 2.70%
• YTD: 16.16%
• 6M: 17.32%
• 1Y: 40.49%
• 3Y*: 23.37%
• 5Y*: 14.63%
• 10Y*: —

GSIB

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 10.04%
• YTD: 15.97%
• 6M: 18.23%
• 1Y: 49.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWJV vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EWJV iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF	16.16%	33.96%	11.59%	1.20%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	15.97%	61.67%	32.86%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EWJV and GSIB is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.58

The correlation between EWJV and GSIB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWJV vs. GSIB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWJV	GSIB
Financial Services	30.1%	100.0%
Industrials	22.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	14.0%	-
Communication Services	9.1%	-
Technology	7.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	-
Basic Materials	3.3%	-
Real Estate	3.2%	-
Healthcare	2.8%	-
Energy	1.8%	-
Utilities	1.5%	-

Return for Risk

EWJV vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWJV

EWJV Risk / Return Rank: 64
EWJV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
EWJV Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
EWJV Omega Ratio Rank: 69
EWJV Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
EWJV Martin Ratio Rank: 51

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 82
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 85
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWJV vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWJV	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	2.83	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	3.89	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.47	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	3.54	-0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.23	12.48	-4.26

EWJV vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWJV Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWJV and GSIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWJV vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWJV drawdown since its inception was -30.05%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJV and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWJV	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.05%	-17.71%	-12.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.74%	-13.90%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.00%	0.00%	-3.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-2.03%	-4.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.94%	3.94%	+1.00%

Volatility

EWJV vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) is 4.94%, while Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that EWJV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWJV	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.94%	5.27%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.95%	14.36%	+0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.51%	17.39%	+2.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.03%	18.47%	-0.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.54%	18.47%	+0.07%

EWJV vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWJV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWJV vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

EWJV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than GSIB's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EWJV iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF	4.89%	5.35%	4.10%	3.32%	2.71%	2.46%	1.96%	4.29%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.64%	1.91%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWJV and GSIB in my portfolio?

EWJV and GSIB have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWJV or GSIB?

GSIB has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to EWJV (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWJV dropped -30.05% vs GSIB's -17.71%.

Which ETF is better, EWJV or GSIB?

On 1-year performance, GSIB leads with 49.03% vs 40.49% for EWJV. On fees, EWJV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EWJV has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWJV or GSIB?

Over the 1-year period, GSIB has performed better with a 49.03% return vs 40.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWJV or GSIB?

EWJV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GSIB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWJV or GSIB?

EWJV has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 1.64% for GSIB.

What is the main difference between EWJV and GSIB?

EWJV is categorized as Japan Equities, while GSIB is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EWJV and 0.35% for GSIB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.