EWJ vs. VEA
EWJ (iShares MSCI Japan ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index, while VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWJ returned 9.55%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for VEA. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EWJ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
EWJ vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EWJ having a 14.83% return and VEA slightly lower at 14.73%. Over the past 10 years, EWJ has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 9.55%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.72% annualized return.
EWJ
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- 1Y
- 31.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
VEA
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 6M
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
EWJ vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 14.83% | 25.84% | 7.03% | 20.29% | -17.72% | 1.16% | 15.40% | 19.34% | -14.10% | 24.27% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.73% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWJ and VEA is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007 | 0.81 |
The correlation between EWJ and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWJ vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWJ
VEA
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
EWJ
VEA
Technology
EWJ
VEA
Financial Services
EWJ
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
EWJ
VEA
Communication Services
EWJ
VEA
Healthcare
EWJ
VEA
Basic Materials
EWJ
VEA
Consumer Defensive
EWJ
VEA
Real Estate
EWJ
VEA
Utilities
EWJ
VEA
Energy
EWJ
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWJ vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
EWJ
VEA
EWJ vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWJ | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.33 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 2.58 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.62 | 9.92 | -2.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWJ vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWJ drawdown since its inception was -60.93%, roughly equal to the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJ and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWJ | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.93% | -60.68% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -11.63% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | -13.45% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.14% | -29.71% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.14% | -35.73% | +2.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -1.06% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.72% | -13.28% | -8.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 3.02% | +1.02% |
Volatility
EWJ vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) is 6.31%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that EWJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWJ | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 6.84% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.96% | 14.38% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.23% | 16.58% | +3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 16.72% | +1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 17.40% | -0.07% |
EWJ vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWJ vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
EWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than VEA's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 3.94% | 4.52% | 2.34% | 2.03% | 1.23% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 2.03% | 1.71% | 1.25% | 1.95% | 1.27% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWJ and VEA have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to EWJ (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWJ dropped -60.93% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.72% vs 9.55% for EWJ. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EWJ has been the lower-risk option at 6.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWJ.
EWJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.
EWJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWJ and 0.03% for VEA.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWJ and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer