PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWJ vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWJ vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EWJ having a 14.83% return and VEA slightly lower at 14.73%. Over the past 10 years, EWJ has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 9.55%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.72% annualized return.


EWJ

1D
0.57%
1M
1.80%
YTD
14.83%
6M
14.50%
1Y
31.74%
3Y*
16.57%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
9.55%

VEA

1D
0.34%
1M
3.58%
YTD
14.73%
6M
16.65%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWJ vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWJ
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
14.83%25.84%7.03%20.29%-17.72%1.16%15.40%19.34%-14.10%24.27%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.73%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EWJ and VEA is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007

0.81

The correlation between EWJ and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWJ vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWJ
VEA

Industrials

24.5%
19.2%

Technology

21.7%
13.8%

Financial Services

17.0%
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
7.5%

Communication Services

8.9%
3.4%

Healthcare

5.6%
8.2%

Basic Materials

3.4%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
5.6%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.7%

Utilities

1.0%
3.3%

Energy

0.9%
5.4%

Industrials

EWJ
24.5%
VEA
19.2%

Technology

EWJ
21.7%
VEA
13.8%

Financial Services

EWJ
17.0%
VEA
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EWJ
11.9%
VEA
7.5%

Communication Services

EWJ
8.9%
VEA
3.4%

Healthcare

EWJ
5.6%
VEA
8.2%

Basic Materials

EWJ
3.4%
VEA
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

EWJ
3.3%
VEA
5.6%

Real Estate

EWJ
1.9%
VEA
2.7%

Utilities

EWJ
1.0%
VEA
3.3%

Energy

EWJ
0.9%
VEA
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWJ vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWJ
EWJ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWJ vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWJVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.58

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.62

9.92

-2.30

EWJ vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWJ and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWJ vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWJ drawdown since its inception was -60.93%, roughly equal to the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJ and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWJVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.93%

-60.68%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.59%

-11.63%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.68%

-13.45%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.14%

-29.71%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.14%

-35.73%

+2.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-1.06%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.72%

-13.28%

-8.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

3.02%

+1.02%

Volatility

EWJ vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) is 6.31%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that EWJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWJVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

6.84%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.96%

14.38%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.23%

16.58%

+3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.38%

16.72%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.33%

17.40%

-0.07%

EWJ vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWJ vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

EWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWJ
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
3.94%4.52%2.34%2.03%1.23%2.08%1.04%2.03%1.71%1.25%1.95%1.27%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWJ and VEA have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to EWJ (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWJ dropped -60.93% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.72% vs 9.55% for EWJ. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EWJ has been the lower-risk option at 6.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWJ.

EWJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.

EWJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWJ and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWJ and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer