PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWI vs. EFNL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWI vs. EFNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWI achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly lower than EFNL's 21.71% return. Over the past 10 years, EWI has outperformed EFNL with an annualized return of 13.06%, while EFNL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.06% annualized return.


EWI

1D
0.97%
1M
2.18%
YTD
8.74%
6M
12.61%
1Y
27.58%
3Y*
29.18%
5Y*
15.62%
10Y*
13.06%

EFNL

1D
0.56%
1M
5.88%
YTD
21.71%
6M
26.34%
1Y
47.52%
3Y*
21.88%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWI vs. EFNL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
8.74%55.72%10.23%30.63%-14.16%14.38%1.69%26.98%-17.18%28.70%
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
21.71%53.59%-5.28%-0.12%-17.29%10.50%20.19%13.64%-6.86%23.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EWI and EFNL is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2012

0.70

The correlation between EWI and EFNL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWI vs. EFNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWI
EFNL

Financial Services

47.5%
26.0%

Utilities

18.3%
4.0%

Industrials

12.5%
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
6.6%

Energy

7.5%
5.2%

Communication Services

2.2%
2.6%

Healthcare

1.4%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
2.9%

Basic Materials

0.6%
6.3%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Technology

-

21.4%

Financial Services

EWI
47.5%
EFNL
26.0%

Utilities

EWI
18.3%
EFNL
4.0%

Industrials

EWI
12.5%
EFNL
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EWI
8.7%
EFNL
6.6%

Energy

EWI
7.5%
EFNL
5.2%

Communication Services

EWI
2.2%
EFNL
2.6%

Healthcare

EWI
1.4%
EFNL
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

EWI
0.9%
EFNL
2.9%

Basic Materials

EWI
0.6%
EFNL
6.3%

Real Estate

EWI

-

EFNL
0.7%

Technology

EWI

-

EFNL
21.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWI vs. EFNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWI
EWI Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWI Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
EWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWI Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

EFNL
EFNL Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EFNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFNL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EFNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFNL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWI vs. EFNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWIEFNLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.46

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

6.03

-3.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.27

21.34

-13.07

EWI vs. EFNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWI Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the EFNL Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWI and EFNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWIEFNLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

2.78

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.35

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.50

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.47

-0.24

Drawdowns

EWI vs. EFNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWI drawdown since its inception was -70.38%, which is greater than EFNL's maximum drawdown of -38.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWI and EFNL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWIEFNLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.38%

-38.70%

-31.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-7.92%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.80%

-18.19%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.25%

-38.70%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.00%

-38.70%

-4.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

0.00%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.94%

-10.93%

-18.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

2.23%

+1.11%

Volatility

EWI vs. EFNL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) is 6.17%, while iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) has a volatility of 6.70%. This indicates that EWI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWIEFNLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.17%

6.70%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.70%

13.87%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.05%

17.23%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.10%

19.60%

+1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.26%

20.09%

+3.17%

EWI vs. EFNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWI has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EFNL's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWI vs. EFNL - Dividend Comparison

EWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than EFNL's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
2.79%3.40%5.05%4.31%5.94%2.29%2.94%5.70%3.83%3.30%2.40%1.57%
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
2.58%2.80%4.07%3.40%4.57%2.63%1.66%3.80%4.71%2.19%3.64%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWI and EFNL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFNL has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to EWI (6.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWI dropped -70.38% vs EFNL's -38.70%.

On 10-year performance, EWI leads with 13.06% vs 10.06% for EFNL. On fees, EWI is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWI has been the lower-risk option at 6.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWI has performed better with a 13.06% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWI is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EFNL.

EFNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 2.58% for EWI.

EWI tracks MSCI Italy Index, while EFNL tracks MSCI Finland IMI 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWI and 0.53% for EFNL.

EFNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWI and EFNL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer