PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWI vs. QQQE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWI vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWI achieves a 15.62% return, which is significantly higher than QQQE's 14.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EWI having a 14.81% annualized return and QQQE not far behind at 14.70%.


EWI

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.60%
6M
12.41%
YTD
15.62%
1Y
33.05%
3Y*
27.26%
5Y*
17.91%
10Y*
14.81%
ALL TIME*
6.60%

QQQE

1D
0.29%
1M
-2.56%
6M
13.07%
YTD
14.79%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
14.21%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
14.70%
ALL TIME*
14.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$23.18M$26.44M$25.34M
$22.33M$22.31M$23.91M

EWI vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
15.62%55.72%10.23%30.63%-14.16%14.38%1.69%26.98%-17.18%28.70%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
14.79%14.58%6.98%33.76%-24.47%17.93%37.85%36.43%-5.40%26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between EWI and QQQE is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2012

0.58

The correlation between EWI and QQQE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWI vs. QQQE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWI
QQQE

Financial Services

50.1%
1.0%

Utilities

18.0%
3.9%

Industrials

10.4%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
10.9%

Energy

6.6%
1.8%

Communication Services

2.7%
9.6%

Healthcare

1.3%
8.8%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
8.0%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Technology

-

44.3%

Financial Services

EWI
50.1%
QQQE
1.0%

Utilities

EWI
18.0%
QQQE
3.9%

Industrials

EWI
10.4%
QQQE
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EWI
9.0%
QQQE
10.9%

Energy

EWI
6.6%
QQQE
1.8%

Communication Services

EWI
2.7%
QQQE
9.6%

Healthcare

EWI
1.3%
QQQE
8.8%

Basic Materials

EWI
1.0%
QQQE
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

EWI
0.9%
QQQE
8.0%

Real Estate

EWI

-

QQQE
0.7%

Technology

EWI

-

QQQE
44.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWI vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EWI
EWI Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWI Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQE
QQQE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QQQE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EWI vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWIQQQEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.22

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.11

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.62

6.75

+2.87

EWI vs. QQQE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWI Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the QQQE Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWI and QQQE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWI vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWI drawdown since its inception was -70.38%, which is greater than QQQE's maximum drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWI and QQQE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWIQQQEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.38%

-32.14%

-38.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-9.41%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.80%

-21.38%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.25%

-32.14%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.00%

-32.14%

-10.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-4.46%

+4.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-5.14%

-23.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

2.94%

+0.38%

Volatility

EWI vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) at 3.68%. This indicates that EWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWIQQQEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

3.68%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.63%

12.96%

+2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.38%

16.02%

+2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.11%

20.58%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.51%

20.76%

+1.75%

EWI vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWI has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWI vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison

EWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than QQQE's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
3.04%2.80%4.07%3.40%4.57%2.63%1.66%3.80%4.71%2.19%3.64%2.31%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
0.58%0.52%0.86%0.79%0.98%3.83%0.54%0.74%0.80%0.65%1.17%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWI and QQQE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWI has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to QQQE (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWI dropped -70.38% vs QQQE's -32.14%.

On 10-year performance, EWI leads with 14.81% vs 14.70% for QQQE. On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QQQE has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWI has performed better with a 14.81% return vs 14.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWI.

EWI has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 0.58% for QQQE.

EWI is categorized as Europe Equities, while QQQE is Nasdaq-100. EWI tracks MSCI Italy 25/50 Index (Net), while QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWI and 0.35% for QQQE.

EWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWI and QQQE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer