EWG vs. EFNL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EWG (iShares MSCI Germany ETF) and EFNL (iShares MSCI Finland ETF) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - EWG tracks the MSCI Germany Index while EFNL tracks the MSCI Finland IMI 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWG returned 7.59%/yr vs 10.07%/yr for EFNL. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for EFNL.

Performance

EWG vs. EFNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWG achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than EFNL's 21.03% return. Over the past 10 years, EWG has underperformed EFNL with an annualized return of 7.59%, while EFNL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.07% annualized return.

EWG

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: 3.11%
• YTD: 0.64%
• 6M: 4.44%
• 1Y: 3.23%
• 3Y*: 16.95%
• 5Y*: 5.94%
• 10Y*: 7.59%

EFNL

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 6.63%
• YTD: 21.03%
• 6M: 25.68%
• 1Y: 48.56%
• 3Y*: 21.52%
• 5Y*: 6.67%
• 10Y*: 10.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWG vs. EFNL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF	0.64%	35.79%	9.79%	23.35%	-22.27%	5.84%	10.09%	19.15%	-21.40%	27.42%
EFNL iShares MSCI Finland ETF	21.03%	53.59%	-5.28%	-0.12%	-17.29%	10.50%	20.19%	13.64%	-6.86%	23.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EWG and EFNL is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2012	0.76

The correlation between EWG and EFNL shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWG vs. EFNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWG	EFNL
Industrials	30.3%	20.8%
Financial Services	21.6%	26.0%
Technology	13.8%	21.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	6.6%
Communication Services	6.6%	2.6%
Healthcare	6.1%	3.5%
Basic Materials	5.8%	6.3%
Utilities	4.9%	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	2.9%
Real Estate	1.3%	0.7%
Energy	-	5.2%

Return for Risk

EWG vs. EFNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWG

EWG Risk / Return Rank: 11
EWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
EWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
EWG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
EWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
EWG Martin Ratio Rank: 12

EFNL

EFNL Risk / Return Rank: 86
EFNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
EFNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
EFNL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
EFNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
EFNL Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWG vs. EFNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EWG	EFNL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.19	2.83	-2.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	3.69	-3.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.47	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.22	6.16	-5.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.66	21.80	-21.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EWG vs. EFNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWG Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the EFNL Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWG and EFNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EWG	EFNL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19	2.83	-2.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.34	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	0.50	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.47	-0.22

Drawdowns

EWG vs. EFNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWG drawdown since its inception was -67.57%, which is greater than EFNL's maximum drawdown of -38.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWG and EFNL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWG	EFNL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.57%	-38.70%	-28.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.54%	-7.92%	-6.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.81%	-18.19%	+2.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.44%	-38.70%	-4.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.80%	-38.70%	-8.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.02%	-0.44%	-3.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.20%	-10.93%	-8.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.89%	2.23%	+2.66%

Volatility

EWG vs. EFNL - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) have volatilities of 6.49% and 6.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWG	EFNL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.49%	6.77%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.18%	13.87%	+0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.28%	17.28%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.48%	19.60%	+0.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.11%	20.09%	+1.02%

EWG vs. EFNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EFNL's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWG vs. EFNL - Dividend Comparison

EWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than EFNL's 2.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFNL iShares MSCI Finland ETF	2.81%	3.40%	5.05%	4.31%	5.94%	2.29%	2.94%	5.70%	3.83%	3.30%	2.40%	1.57%
EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF	1.59%	1.60%	2.38%	2.56%	3.24%	2.70%	1.67%	2.51%	2.93%	2.06%	2.35%	1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWG and EFNL in my portfolio?

EWG and EFNL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWG or EFNL?

EFNL has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to EWG (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWG dropped -67.57% vs EFNL's -38.70%.

Which ETF is better, EWG or EFNL?

On 10-year performance, EFNL leads with 10.07% vs 7.59% for EWG. On fees, EWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWG has been the lower-risk option at 6.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWG or EFNL?

Over the 10-year period, EFNL has performed better with a 10.07% return vs 7.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWG or EFNL?

EWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EFNL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWG or EFNL?

EFNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.59% for EWG.

What is the main difference between EWG and EFNL?

EWG tracks MSCI Germany Index, while EFNL tracks MSCI Finland IMI 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWG and 0.53% for EFNL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.