PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWG vs. EWQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWG vs. EWQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) and iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWG achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than EWQ's 5.94% return. Over the past 10 years, EWG has underperformed EWQ with an annualized return of 7.90%, while EWQ has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.


EWG

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.28%
6M
1.39%
YTD
2.84%
1Y
7.26%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*
7.90%
ALL TIME*
6.32%

EWQ

1D
0.17%
1M
1.37%
6M
5.10%
YTD
5.94%
1Y
15.63%
3Y*
9.54%
5Y*
7.52%
10Y*
9.96%
ALL TIME*
6.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$53.81M$49.56M$49.69M
$12.00M$12.69M$15.52M

EWG vs. EWQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWG
iShares MSCI Germany ETF
2.84%35.79%9.79%23.35%-22.27%5.84%10.09%19.15%-21.40%27.42%
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
5.94%28.90%-5.63%21.71%-12.05%21.43%2.86%26.69%-12.90%29.11%

Correlation

The correlation between EWG and EWQ is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1996

0.84

The correlation between EWG and EWQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWG vs. EWQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWG
EWQ

Industrials

30.4%
33.1%

Financial Services

22.0%
13.4%

Technology

15.1%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
11.4%

Healthcare

7.0%
8.5%

Communication Services

5.5%
2.8%

Basic Materials

5.2%
7.1%

Utilities

4.7%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
8.5%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.3%

Energy

-

7.2%

Industrials

EWG
30.4%
EWQ
33.1%

Financial Services

EWG
22.0%
EWQ
13.4%

Technology

EWG
15.1%
EWQ
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EWG
7.8%
EWQ
11.4%

Healthcare

EWG
7.0%
EWQ
8.5%

Communication Services

EWG
5.5%
EWQ
2.8%

Basic Materials

EWG
5.2%
EWQ
7.1%

Utilities

EWG
4.7%
EWQ
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

EWG
1.5%
EWQ
8.5%

Real Estate

EWG
0.9%
EWQ
1.3%

Energy

EWG

-

EWQ
7.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWG vs. EWQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EWG
EWG Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
EWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWG Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
EWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWG Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

EWQ
EWQ Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
EWQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EWQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EWG vs. EWQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) and iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWGEWQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.15

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

1.04

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.28

3.10

-1.82

EWG vs. EWQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWG Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the EWQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWG and EWQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWG vs. EWQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWG drawdown since its inception was -67.57%, which is greater than EWQ's maximum drawdown of -61.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWG and EWQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWGEWQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.57%

-61.41%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-13.80%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.49%

-15.16%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.59%

-31.46%

-11.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.80%

-39.23%

-7.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-1.42%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.12%

-16.01%

-3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.86%

4.59%

+0.27%

Volatility

EWG vs. EWQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) at 4.68%. This indicates that EWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWGEWQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

4.68%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.32%

14.69%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.71%

17.42%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.57%

19.85%

+0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.81%

20.39%

+0.42%

EWG vs. EWQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EWQ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWG vs. EWQ - Dividend Comparison

EWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than EWQ's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWG
iShares MSCI Germany ETF
1.94%1.60%2.38%2.56%3.24%2.70%1.67%2.51%2.93%2.06%2.35%1.93%
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
2.83%2.63%3.31%2.73%3.23%3.79%1.02%2.44%2.90%1.90%2.84%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWG and EWQ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWG has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to EWQ (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWG dropped -67.57% vs EWQ's -61.41%.

On 10-year performance, EWQ leads with 9.96% vs 7.90% for EWG. On fees, EWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWQ has performed better with a 9.96% return vs 7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWQ.

EWQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 1.94% for EWG.

EWG tracks MSCI Germany Index, while EWQ tracks MSCI France Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWG and 0.50% for EWQ.

EWQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWG and EWQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer