PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWA vs. ARGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWA vs. ARGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWA achieves a 7.18% return, which is significantly higher than ARGT's 0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, EWA has underperformed ARGT with an annualized return of 8.12%, while ARGT has yielded a comparatively higher 16.85% annualized return.


EWA

1D
0.04%
1M
-4.98%
YTD
7.18%
6M
8.80%
1Y
9.92%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
8.12%

ARGT

1D
0.32%
1M
2.67%
YTD
0.51%
6M
1.13%
1Y
5.97%
3Y*
30.36%
5Y*
25.79%
10Y*
16.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWA vs. ARGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWA
iShares MSCI-Australia ETF
7.18%13.35%1.60%13.81%-5.92%8.93%8.29%22.45%-12.04%19.88%
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
0.51%11.51%63.46%53.64%11.80%3.83%14.58%14.50%-32.62%53.87%

Correlation

The correlation between EWA and ARGT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2011

0.54

The correlation between EWA and ARGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWA vs. ARGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWA
ARGT

Financial Services

43.6%
13.7%

Basic Materials

23.0%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
26.3%

Real Estate

5.0%
1.3%

Healthcare

4.9%

-

Energy

4.5%
22.2%

Industrials

4.5%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
6.9%

Communication Services

2.0%
2.9%

Utilities

1.7%
5.1%

Technology

1.1%

-

Financial Services

EWA
43.6%
ARGT
13.7%

Basic Materials

EWA
23.0%
ARGT
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EWA
6.1%
ARGT
26.3%

Real Estate

EWA
5.0%
ARGT
1.3%

Healthcare

EWA
4.9%
ARGT

-

Energy

EWA
4.5%
ARGT
22.2%

Industrials

EWA
4.5%
ARGT
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

EWA
3.6%
ARGT
6.9%

Communication Services

EWA
2.0%
ARGT
2.9%

Utilities

EWA
1.7%
ARGT
5.1%

Technology

EWA
1.1%
ARGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWA vs. ARGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWA
EWA Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
EWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWA Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
EWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWA Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

ARGT
ARGT Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ARGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARGT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ARGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARGT Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWA vs. ARGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWAARGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.07

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

0.26

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.80

0.58

+2.22

EWA vs. ARGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the ARGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWA and ARGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWAARGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

0.16

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.81

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.54

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.29

-0.01

Drawdowns

EWA vs. ARGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWA drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, which is greater than ARGT's maximum drawdown of -61.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWA and ARGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWAARGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.98%

-61.68%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.01%

-22.97%

+12.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.91%

-28.46%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.87%

-35.14%

+10.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.54%

-61.68%

+16.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.24%

-10.74%

+3.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.33%

-22.04%

+10.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

10.31%

-6.75%

Volatility

EWA vs. ARGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) is 4.98%, while Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) has a volatility of 10.26%. This indicates that EWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWAARGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

10.26%

-5.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.39%

20.41%

-6.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.22%

36.79%

-19.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.77%

31.95%

-12.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.63%

31.45%

-8.82%

EWA vs. ARGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ARGT's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWA vs. ARGT - Dividend Comparison

EWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than ARGT's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARGT
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
0.84%0.84%1.41%1.59%2.45%0.93%0.28%1.21%1.34%0.49%0.36%0.89%
EWA
iShares MSCI-Australia ETF
3.00%3.21%3.71%3.72%5.28%5.08%2.02%3.97%6.11%4.44%4.03%5.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWA and ARGT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARGT has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to EWA (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWA dropped -66.98% vs ARGT's -61.68%.

On 10-year performance, ARGT leads with 16.85% vs 8.12% for EWA. On fees, EWA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWA has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARGT has performed better with a 16.85% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ARGT.

EWA has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 0.84% for ARGT.

EWA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while ARGT is Latin America Equities. EWA tracks MSCI Australia Index, while ARGT tracks MSCI All Argentina 25/50. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWA and 0.60% for ARGT.

EWA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWA and ARGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer