EWA vs. ARGT

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

EWA (iShares MSCI-Australia ETF) and ARGT (Global X MSCI Argentina ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWA is a Australia Equities fund tracking the MSCI Australia Index, while ARGT is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Argentina 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWA returned 7.80%/yr vs 16.40%/yr for ARGT. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for ARGT.

Performance

EWA vs. ARGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWA achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly higher than ARGT's 1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, EWA has underperformed ARGT with an annualized return of 7.80%, while ARGT has yielded a comparatively higher 16.40% annualized return.

EWA

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: -0.14%
• 6M: 8.16%
• YTD: 10.43%
• 1Y: 11.21%
• 3Y*: 10.93%
• 5Y*: 6.35%
• 10Y*: 7.80%
• ALL TIME*: 7.55%

ARGT

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -4.03%
• 6M: 1.75%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 1Y: 16.56%
• 3Y*: 26.65%
• 5Y*: 26.59%
• 10Y*: 16.40%
• ALL TIME*: 8.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWA vs. ARGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF	10.43%	13.35%	1.60%	13.81%	-5.92%	8.93%	8.29%	22.45%	-12.04%	19.88%
ARGT Global X MSCI Argentina ETF	1.94%	11.51%	63.46%	53.64%	11.80%	3.83%	14.58%	14.50%	-32.62%	53.87%

Correlation

The correlation between EWA and ARGT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2011	0.54

The correlation between EWA and ARGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWA vs. ARGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWA	ARGT
Financial Services	42.4%	17.6%
Basic Materials	23.8%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	28.5%
Healthcare	5.1%	-
Energy	4.9%	18.3%
Real Estate	4.8%	1.7%
Industrials	4.3%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	6.5%
Communication Services	1.8%	3.1%
Technology	0.9%	-
Utilities	0.6%	5.3%

Return for Risk

EWA vs. ARGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWA

EWA Risk / Return Rank: 26
EWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
EWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
EWA Omega Ratio Rank: 23
EWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
EWA Martin Ratio Rank: 28

ARGT

ARGT Risk / Return Rank: 21
ARGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
ARGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
ARGT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
ARGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
ARGT Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWA vs. ARGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWA	ARGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	0.45	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	0.99	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.12	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	0.75	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.86	1.62	+1.24

EWA vs. ARGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the ARGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWA and ARGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWA vs. ARGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWA drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, which is greater than ARGT's maximum drawdown of -61.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWA and ARGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWA	ARGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.98%	-61.68%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.01%	-22.02%	+12.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.91%	-28.46%	+6.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.87%	-35.14%	+10.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.54%	-61.68%	+16.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.43%	-9.48%	+5.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.30%	-21.94%	+10.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	10.25%	-6.32%

Volatility

EWA vs. ARGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) is 3.66%, while Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that EWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWA	ARGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.66%	6.86%	-3.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.80%	21.34%	-6.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.31%	37.30%	-19.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.75%	32.12%	-12.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.48%	31.49%	-9.01%

EWA vs. ARGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ARGT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWA vs. ARGT - Dividend Comparison

EWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than ARGT's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARGT Global X MSCI Argentina ETF	1.11%	0.84%	1.41%	1.59%	2.45%	0.93%	0.28%	1.21%	1.34%	0.49%	0.36%	0.89%
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF	2.98%	3.21%	3.71%	3.72%	5.28%	5.08%	2.02%	3.97%	6.11%	4.44%	4.03%	5.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWA and ARGT in my portfolio?

EWA and ARGT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWA or ARGT?

ARGT has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to EWA (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWA dropped -66.98% vs ARGT's -61.68%.

Which ETF is better, EWA or ARGT?

On 10-year performance, ARGT leads with 16.40% vs 7.80% for EWA. On fees, EWA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWA has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWA or ARGT?

Over the 10-year period, ARGT has performed better with a 16.40% return vs 7.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWA or ARGT?

EWA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ARGT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWA or ARGT?

EWA has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 1.11% for ARGT.

What is the main difference between EWA and ARGT?

EWA is categorized as Australia Equities, while ARGT is Latin America Equities. EWA tracks MSCI Australia Index, while ARGT tracks MSCI All Argentina 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWA and 0.59% for ARGT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.