EWA vs. EWC
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC).
EWA and EWC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EWA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia Index. It was launched on Mar 18, 1996. EWC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Canada Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. Both EWA and EWC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EWA or EWC.
Correlation
The correlation between EWA and EWC is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EWA vs. EWC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EWA:
0.34
EWC:
1.07
EWA:
0.58
EWC:
1.51
EWA:
1.07
EWC:
1.19
EWA:
0.56
EWC:
1.57
EWA:
1.64
EWC:
7.22
EWA:
3.46%
EWC:
2.00%
EWA:
16.77%
EWC:
13.51%
EWA:
-66.98%
EWC:
-60.75%
EWA:
-10.05%
EWC:
-6.70%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWA achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly lower than EWC's 11.13% return. Over the past 10 years, EWA has underperformed EWC with an annualized return of 5.26%, while EWC has yielded a comparatively higher 5.65% annualized return.
EWA
2.12%
-5.92%
-0.19%
3.42%
5.26%
5.26%
EWC
11.13%
-3.92%
10.57%
12.84%
8.47%
5.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EWA vs. EWC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EWC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EWA vs. EWC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EWA vs. EWC - Dividend Comparison
EWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, more than EWC's 3.48% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF | 5.73% | 3.72% | 5.28% | 5.08% | 2.02% | 3.97% | 6.11% | 4.44% | 4.03% | 5.48% | 4.92% | 4.69% |
EWC iShares MSCI Canada ETF | 3.48% | 2.27% | 2.34% | 1.85% | 2.09% | 2.16% | 2.65% | 1.97% | 1.75% | 2.34% | 2.15% | 2.37% |
Drawdowns
EWA vs. EWC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWA drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, which is greater than EWC's maximum drawdown of -60.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWA and EWC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EWA vs. EWC - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) at 4.28%. This indicates that EWA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.