EWA vs. ^N225
EWA (iShares MSCI-Australia ETF) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Australia Index, while ^N225 (Nikkei 225) is an index. Over the past 10 years, EWA returned 8.38%/yr vs 11.84%/yr for ^N225. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EWA vs. ^N225 - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EWA is traded in USD, while ^N225 is traded in JPY. To make them comparable, the ^N225 values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWA achieves a 8.49% return, which is significantly lower than ^N225's 39.19% return. Over the past 10 years, EWA has underperformed ^N225 with an annualized return of 8.38%, while ^N225 has yielded a comparatively higher 11.84% annualized return.
EWA
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 8.49%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- 1Y
- 12.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.88%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
^N225
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 12.58%
- YTD
- 39.19%
- 6M
- 38.77%
- 1Y
- 70.69%
- 3Y*
- 25.23%
- 5Y*
- 11.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
EWA vs. ^N225 - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF | 8.49% | 13.35% | 1.60% | 13.81% | -5.92% | 8.93% | 8.29% | 22.45% | -12.04% | 19.88% |
^N225 Nikkei 225 | 39.19% | 26.56% | 7.17% | 19.21% | -20.48% | -5.90% | 22.42% | 19.73% | -10.20% | 23.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWA and ^N225 is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2007 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWA vs. ^N225 — Risk / Return Rank
EWA
^N225
EWA vs. ^N225 - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and Nikkei 225 (^N225). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWA | ^N225 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.44 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 4.81 | -3.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.29 | 15.37 | -12.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWA vs. ^N225 - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWA drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, which is greater than ^N225's maximum drawdown of -52.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWA and ^N225.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWA | ^N225 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.98% | -52.23% | -14.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -14.75% | +4.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.91% | -24.78% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | -36.26% | +11.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.54% | -37.97% | -7.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.10% | 0.00% | -6.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.32% | -13.56% | +2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 4.53% | -0.86% |
Volatility
EWA vs. ^N225 - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) is 5.73%, while Nikkei 225 (^N225) has a volatility of 8.55%. This indicates that EWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^N225 based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWA | ^N225 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 8.55% | -2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.76% | 21.28% | -6.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.44% | 26.28% | -8.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 23.87% | -4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 21.57% | +0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWA and ^N225 have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
^N225 has higher volatility (8.55%) compared to EWA (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWA dropped -66.98% vs ^N225's -52.23%.
^N225 currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWA and ^N225
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer