EVX vs. CLH
EVX (VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the NYSE Arca Environmental Services Index, while CLH (Clean Harbors, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, EVX returned 11.88%/yr vs 19.84%/yr for CLH. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
EVX vs. CLH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVX achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than CLH's 33.44% return. Over the past 10 years, EVX has underperformed CLH with an annualized return of 11.88%, while CLH has yielded a comparatively higher 19.84% annualized return.
EVX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 5.86%
- 1Y
- 6.37%
- 3Y*
- 8.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.24%
CLH
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 7.45%
- 6M
- 20.38%
- YTD
- 33.44%
- 1Y
- 33.61%
- 3Y*
- 23.34%
- 5Y*
- 26.92%
- 10Y*
- 19.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $176.63M | $150.14M | $163.26M | |
| $226.61K | $218.18K | $309.27K |
EVX vs. CLH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVX VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF | 5.86% | 11.72% | 12.99% | 12.97% | -10.58% | 27.47% | 13.28% | 28.41% | -3.82% | 16.05% |
CLH Clean Harbors, Inc. | 33.44% | 1.89% | 31.88% | 52.92% | 14.38% | 31.10% | -11.25% | 73.76% | -8.95% | -2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVX and CLH is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2006 | 0.55 |
The correlation between EVX and CLH shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVX vs. CLH — Risk / Return Rank
EVX
CLH
EVX vs. CLH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) and Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EVX | CLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.24 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 1.69 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | 5.03 | -4.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EVX vs. CLH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVX drawdown since its inception was -55.91%, smaller than the maximum CLH drawdown of -93.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVX and CLH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVX | CLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.91% | -93.48% | +37.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.85% | -19.45% | +8.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.36% | -30.86% | +13.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.45% | -30.86% | +9.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.01% | -64.51% | +23.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.37% | -4.12% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.72% | -32.79% | +24.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 6.51% | -1.60% |
Volatility
EVX vs. CLH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) is 3.43%, while Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that EVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVX | CLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | 8.83% | -5.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 20.06% | -10.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.97% | 28.34% | -14.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 28.74% | -11.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 34.80% | -14.57% |
Dividends
EVX vs. CLH - Dividend Comparison
EVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while CLH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLH Clean Harbors, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EVX VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF | 0.18% | 0.19% | 0.46% | 0.95% | 0.41% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.89% | 0.70% | 1.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVX and CLH have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLH has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to EVX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVX dropped -55.91% vs CLH's -93.48%.
CLH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVX and CLH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer