PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVUS vs. FNDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVUS vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF (EVUS) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVUS achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 20.97% return.


EVUS

1D
0.80%
1M
3.17%
YTD
11.10%
6M
11.54%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
10Y*

FNDF

1D
-0.20%
1M
5.03%
YTD
20.97%
6M
24.09%
1Y
43.94%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
11.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVUS vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EVUS
Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF
11.10%13.31%14.23%3.45%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
20.97%40.99%2.29%9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between EVUS and FNDF is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023

0.70

The correlation between EVUS and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

EVUS vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EVUS
FNDF

Financial Services

19.0%
16.7%

Technology

15.9%
11.1%

Communication Services

13.1%
4.9%

Healthcare

12.3%
5.5%

Industrials

11.0%
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
6.9%

Energy

6.8%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.8%
10.7%

Utilities

3.7%
3.8%

Real Estate

3.4%
0.9%

Basic Materials

2.9%
11.3%

Financial Services

EVUS
19.0%
FNDF
16.7%

Technology

EVUS
15.9%
FNDF
11.1%

Communication Services

EVUS
13.1%
FNDF
4.9%

Healthcare

EVUS
12.3%
FNDF
5.5%

Industrials

EVUS
11.0%
FNDF
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

EVUS
7.1%
FNDF
6.9%

Energy

EVUS
6.8%
FNDF
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EVUS
4.8%
FNDF
10.7%

Utilities

EVUS
3.7%
FNDF
3.8%

Real Estate

EVUS
3.4%
FNDF
0.9%

Basic Materials

EVUS
2.9%
FNDF
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVUS vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVUS
EVUS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVUS vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF (EVUS) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVUSFNDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.52

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

4.17

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.01

15.91

-2.90

EVUS vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVUS and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVUSFNDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

2.94

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.54

+0.47

Drawdowns

EVUS vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.65%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVUS and FNDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVUSFNDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.65%

-40.14%

+24.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-10.60%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.65%

-13.89%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.87%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-7.64%

+4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.77%

-0.94%

Volatility

EVUS vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF (EVUS) is 2.35%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that EVUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVUSFNDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

5.10%

-2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.95%

12.53%

-4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.49%

15.04%

-4.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.72%

16.18%

-3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.72%

17.67%

-4.95%

EVUS vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EVUS vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

EVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than FNDF's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVUS
Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF
1.54%1.62%1.99%2.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
2.84%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVUS and FNDF have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDF has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to EVUS (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVUS dropped -15.65% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

On 3-year performance, FNDF leads with 24.21% vs 16.51% for EVUS. On fees, EVUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EVUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 24.21% return vs 16.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 1.54% for EVUS.

EVUS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EVUS tracks MSCI USA Value Extended ESG Focus Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EVUS and 0.25% for FNDF.

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVUS and FNDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer