EVFTX vs. BLNDX
EVFTX (E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund) and BLNDX (Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, EVFTX returned 4.52%/yr vs 8.97%/yr for BLNDX. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EVFTX charges 1.19%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for BLNDX.
Performance
EVFTX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVFTX achieves a 7.14% return, which is significantly lower than BLNDX's 13.93% return.
EVFTX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 7.14%
- 1Y
- 12.38%
- 3Y*
- 9.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.83%
BLNDX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 13.93%
- 1Y
- 28.41%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
EVFTX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVFTX E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund | 7.14% | 12.51% | 6.21% | 8.70% | -11.39% | 4.13% | 12.91% | 0.10% |
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional | 13.93% | 4.12% | 13.11% | 5.79% | 3.71% | 20.16% | 16.30% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVFTX and BLNDX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019 | 0.61 |
The correlation between EVFTX and BLNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVFTX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank
EVFTX
BLNDX
EVFTX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund (EVFTX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EVFTX | BLNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.41 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 4.21 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.14 | 12.90 | -3.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EVFTX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVFTX drawdown since its inception was -24.47%, which is greater than BLNDX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVFTX and BLNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVFTX | BLNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.47% | -17.69% | -6.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.94% | -7.24% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.34% | -17.69% | +8.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.06% | -17.69% | +1.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -3.88% | +2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -3.23% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 2.36% | -0.89% |
Volatility
EVFTX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison
E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund (EVFTX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) have volatilities of 2.74% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVFTX | BLNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 2.88% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.55% | 8.97% | -1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.80% | 12.91% | -4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.77% | 11.63% | -3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.86% | 11.75% | -2.89% |
EVFTX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVFTX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVFTX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison
EVFTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than BLNDX's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional | 0.65% | 0.73% | 5.74% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 6.11% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EVFTX E-Valuator Conservative/Moderate (30%-50%) RMS Fund | 3.18% | 4.60% | 1.06% | 2.83% | 1.66% | 12.53% | 0.71% | 1.14% | 6.85% | 6.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVFTX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLNDX has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to EVFTX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVFTX dropped -24.47% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.
BLNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVFTX and BLNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer