EVFGX vs. QBDSX
Compare and contrast key facts about E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX).
EVFGX is managed by E-Valuator funds. It was launched on Feb 28, 2012. QBDSX is managed by Advisors Preferred. It was launched on Aug 8, 2013.
Performance
EVFGX vs. QBDSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EVFGX vs. QBDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVFGX E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund | -0.67% | 19.07% | 9.32% | 15.33% | -15.99% | 11.00% | 19.54% | 24.65% | -11.29% | 19.61% |
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund | -0.38% | 5.11% | 1.02% | 2.25% | -4.09% | -0.66% | -9.22% | 10.50% | -3.17% | 5.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVFGX achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than QBDSX's -0.38% return.
EVFGX
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 20.70%
- 3Y*
- 12.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.88%
- 10Y*
- —
QBDSX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- -1.53%
- 1Y
- 2.25%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- 0.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EVFGX vs. QBDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVFGX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than QBDSX's 1.31% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EVFGX vs. QBDSX — Risk / Return Rank
EVFGX
QBDSX
EVFGX vs. QBDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVFGX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 0.60 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.83 | 0.87 | +0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.11 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 0.89 | +0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 3.43 | +4.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVFGX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 0.60 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.21 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.15 | +0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between EVFGX and QBDSX is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EVFGX vs. QBDSX - Dividend Comparison
EVFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.52%, more than QBDSX's 4.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVFGX E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund | 19.52% | 19.39% | 0.00% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 17.87% | 2.97% | 0.74% | 8.11% | 9.49% | 0.31% | 0.00% |
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund | 4.49% | 4.47% | 3.98% | 4.51% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 0.87% | 2.26% | 2.04% | 2.51% | 1.00% | 3.89% |
Drawdowns
EVFGX vs. QBDSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVFGX drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, which is greater than QBDSX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVFGX and QBDSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVFGX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -18.38% | -15.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.52% | -3.09% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.37% | -7.40% | -16.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.88% | -8.41% | +1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.62% | -6.83% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 0.80% | +1.82% |
Volatility
EVFGX vs. QBDSX - Volatility Comparison
E-Valuator Aggressive Growth (85%-99%) RMS Fund (EVFGX) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) at 1.40%. This indicates that EVFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EVFGX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 1.40% | +5.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.51% | 2.77% | +7.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 3.77% | +12.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 4.32% | +10.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 5.26% | +10.39% |