EVFCX vs. PALDX
Compare and contrast key facts about E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund (EVFCX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX).
EVFCX is managed by E-Valuator funds. It was launched on Feb 28, 2012. PALDX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017.
Performance
EVFCX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EVFCX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVFCX E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund | -1.75% | 10.49% | 3.43% | 6.73% | -9.65% | 1.78% | 10.84% | 12.57% | -4.42% | 2.92% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | -1.78% | 13.62% | 18.96% | 18.90% | -15.65% | 16.30% | 10.68% | 22.27% | -4.12% | 5.95% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EVFCX having a -1.75% return and PALDX slightly lower at -1.78%.
EVFCX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.25%
- YTD
- -1.75%
- 6M
- -0.61%
- 1Y
- 8.00%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- 2.14%
- 10Y*
- —
PALDX
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -3.56%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 14.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EVFCX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVFCX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EVFCX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank
EVFCX
PALDX
EVFCX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund (EVFCX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVFCX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 1.26 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 1.86 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.28 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 1.82 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.93 | 8.67 | -1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVFCX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.26 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.68 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.73 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between EVFCX and PALDX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EVFCX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison
EVFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than PALDX's 5.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVFCX E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund | 2.88% | 2.83% | 1.81% | 3.66% | 2.06% | 12.38% | 1.68% | 2.17% | 6.26% | 4.47% | 0.76% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 5.52% | 5.42% | 10.40% | 2.94% | 6.19% | 6.87% | 2.58% | 4.58% | 3.65% | 1.48% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EVFCX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVFCX drawdown since its inception was -19.11%, smaller than the maximum PALDX drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVFCX and PALDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVFCX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.11% | -26.16% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.54% | -8.20% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.38% | -20.47% | +7.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.52% | -4.16% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -4.16% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 1.72% | -0.58% |
Volatility
EVFCX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for E-Valuator Conservative (15%-30%) RMS Fund (EVFCX) is 2.65%, while PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that EVFCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EVFCX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 3.74% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.18% | 6.16% | -1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.48% | 11.65% | -5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.58% | 12.11% | -6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.54% | 12.76% | -6.22% |