EUV vs. XMLV

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

EUV (Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF) and XMLV (Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUV is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Corgi Funds, while XMLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index. EUV is actively managed, while XMLV is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. EUV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XMLV.

Performance

EUV vs. XMLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV) and Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EUV

• 1D: 7.00%
• 1M: -13.86%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

XMLV

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 6.31%
• 6M: 8.20%
• YTD: 11.38%
• 1Y: 14.44%
• 3Y*: 11.44%
• 5Y*: 7.62%
• 10Y*: 7.95%
• ALL TIME*: 10.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUV vs. XMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF	-1.44%
XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF	5.60%

Correlation

The correlation between EUV and XMLV is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	-0.34

Return for Risk

EUV vs. XMLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XMLV

XMLV Risk / Return Rank: 52
XMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
XMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
XMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 46
XMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
XMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUV vs. XMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV) and Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EUV	XMLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.34	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.00	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.23	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.06	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.81	—

Drawdowns

EUV vs. XMLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUV drawdown since its inception was -24.11%, smaller than the maximum XMLV drawdown of -39.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUV and XMLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	EUV	XMLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.11%	-39.86%	+15.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.80%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.53%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.79%	-1.07%	-17.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.50%	-4.23%	-3.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.13%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EUV	XMLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.25%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.82%	10.82%	+60.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.82%	14.49%	+56.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.82%	16.97%	+53.85%

EUV vs. XMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XMLV's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

EUV vs. XMLV - Dividend Comparison

EUV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF	2.85%	2.87%	2.23%	2.34%	2.05%	1.14%	1.93%	2.02%	2.13%	1.74%	1.72%	1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EUV and XMLV in my portfolio?

EUV and XMLV have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EUV or XMLV?

On fees, XMLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EUV or XMLV?

XMLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EUV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EUV or XMLV?

XMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.00% for EUV.

What is the main difference between EUV and XMLV?

EUV is categorized as Technology Equities, while XMLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EUV and 0.25% for XMLV.