EUV vs. CQTM

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

EUV (Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF) and CQTM (Corgi Quantum Computing ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from Corgi Funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

EUV vs. CQTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV) and Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EUV

• 1D: -4.71%
• 1M: -12.08%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CQTM

• 1D: -6.53%
• 1M: -10.59%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUV vs. CQTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF	-2.54%
CQTM Corgi Quantum Computing ETF	-7.97%

Correlation

The correlation between EUV and CQTM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.69

Return for Risk

EUV vs. CQTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV) and Corgi Quantum Computing ETF (CQTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

EUV vs. CQTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUV drawdown since its inception was -19.98%, smaller than the maximum CQTM drawdown of -26.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUV and CQTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EUV	CQTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.98%	-26.65%	+6.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.70%	-26.65%	+6.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-9.29%	+3.56%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EUV	CQTM	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.02%	86.91%	-14.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.02%	86.91%	-14.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.02%	86.91%	-14.89%

EUV vs. CQTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EUV and CQTM have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

EUV vs. CQTM - Dividend Comparison

Neither EUV nor CQTM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EUV and CQTM in my portfolio?

EUV and CQTM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EUV or CQTM?

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EUV or CQTM?

EUV and CQTM have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EUV or CQTM?

EUV and CQTM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.