EUV vs. CHPS

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

EUV (Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUV is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Corgi, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. EUV is actively managed, while CHPS is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EUV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

EUV vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EUV

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: -11.58%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CHPS

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -13.02%
• 6M: 42.22%
• YTD: 68.49%
• 1Y: 137.92%
• 3Y*: 46.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 46.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	$2.30M	$2.47M	$3.85M
EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF	$18.51M	$23.86M	$39.92M

EUV vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF	-11.92%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between EUV and CHPS is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026	0.93

Return for Risk

EUV vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EUV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 92
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EUV vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EUV	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.97	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.17	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.42	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.14	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	17.64	—

Drawdowns

EUV vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUV drawdown since its inception was -35.33%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUV and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	EUV	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.33%	-39.44%	+4.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-32.74%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.42%	-26.00%	-1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.06%	-9.36%	-0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.66%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EUV	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	40.35%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.88%	45.70%	+27.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.88%	37.29%	+35.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.88%	37.29%	+35.59%

EUV vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

EUV vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

EUV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.39%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%
EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EUV and CHPS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, EUV and CHPS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, EUV or CHPS?

On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EUV or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EUV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EUV or CHPS?

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for EUV.

What is the main difference between EUV and CHPS?

EUV is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Corgi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EUV and 0.15% for CHPS.