EUV vs. CHPS
EUV (Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUV is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Corgi Funds, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. EUV is actively managed, while CHPS is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EUV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
EUV vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EUV
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- 12.98%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- 25.08%
- YTD
- 127.70%
- 6M
- 129.64%
- 1Y
- 231.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUV vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF | 17.95% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 38.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUV and CHPS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUV vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
EUV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CHPS
EUV vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EUV | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.75 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 13.35 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 49.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EUV vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUV drawdown since its inception was -10.51%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUV and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUV | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.51% | -39.44% | +28.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -9.08% | +5.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.70% | — |
Volatility
EUV vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUV | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.99% | 38.78% | +23.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.99% | 35.16% | +26.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.99% | 35.16% | +26.83% |
EUV vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUV vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
EUV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.29% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% |
EUV Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUV and CHPS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EUV.
CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for EUV.
EUV is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Corgi Funds and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EUV and 0.15% for CHPS.
Find the right allocation for EUV and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer