PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUSA vs. HEWJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUSA vs. HEWJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUSA achieves a 9.38% return, which is significantly lower than HEWJ's 25.28% return. Over the past 10 years, EUSA has underperformed HEWJ with an annualized return of 11.59%, while HEWJ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.30% annualized return.


EUSA

1D
0.47%
1M
4.24%
YTD
9.38%
6M
9.41%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
14.76%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
11.59%

HEWJ

1D
2.28%
1M
9.16%
YTD
25.28%
6M
27.71%
1Y
58.27%
3Y*
29.10%
5Y*
22.86%
10Y*
17.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUSA vs. HEWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
9.38%10.24%14.64%17.72%-17.13%25.60%15.03%30.56%-8.58%19.02%
HEWJ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
25.28%30.25%24.80%36.21%-4.39%12.79%10.29%20.79%-14.68%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EUSA and HEWJ is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2014

0.63

The correlation between EUSA and HEWJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.64 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EUSA vs. HEWJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EUSA
HEWJ

Technology

20.3%
23.3%

Industrials

15.3%
23.5%

Financial Services

14.7%
17.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
11.1%

Healthcare

10.8%
5.7%

Utilities

5.4%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
3.2%

Real Estate

5.2%
1.8%

Basic Materials

4.3%
3.9%

Communication Services

4.0%
6.7%

Energy

3.8%
0.9%

Technology

EUSA
20.3%
HEWJ
23.3%

Industrials

EUSA
15.3%
HEWJ
23.5%

Financial Services

EUSA
14.7%
HEWJ
17.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EUSA
11.1%
HEWJ
11.1%

Healthcare

EUSA
10.8%
HEWJ
5.7%

Utilities

EUSA
5.4%
HEWJ
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

EUSA
5.3%
HEWJ
3.2%

Real Estate

EUSA
5.2%
HEWJ
1.8%

Basic Materials

EUSA
4.3%
HEWJ
3.9%

Communication Services

EUSA
4.0%
HEWJ
6.7%

Energy

EUSA
3.8%
HEWJ
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUSA vs. HEWJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUSA
EUSA Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
EUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

HEWJ
HEWJ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HEWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HEWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUSA vs. HEWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUSAHEWJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.54

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

5.65

-3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.43

21.85

-12.42

EUSA vs. HEWJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the HEWJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUSA and HEWJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUSA vs. HEWJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUSA drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, which is greater than HEWJ's maximum drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUSA and HEWJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUSAHEWJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-31.53%

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-10.37%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.20%

-20.90%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.24%

-20.90%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

-31.53%

-7.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

0.00%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-6.59%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

2.68%

-0.70%

Volatility

EUSA vs. HEWJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) is 3.92%, while iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that EUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HEWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUSAHEWJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

6.27%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

14.73%

-5.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

19.39%

-7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.00%

19.18%

-2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

19.68%

-1.32%

EUSA vs. HEWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUSA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than HEWJ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUSA vs. HEWJ - Dividend Comparison

EUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than HEWJ's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
1.48%1.63%1.47%1.53%1.73%1.23%1.45%1.49%2.01%1.50%1.59%2.21%
HEWJ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
4.07%5.10%2.20%2.02%47.68%2.03%1.20%2.78%1.37%1.21%1.88%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUSA and HEWJ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEWJ has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to EUSA (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUSA dropped -39.16% vs HEWJ's -31.53%.

On 10-year performance, HEWJ leads with 17.30% vs 11.59% for EUSA. On fees, EUSA is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HEWJ has performed better with a 17.30% return vs 11.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EUSA is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HEWJ.

HEWJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 1.48% for EUSA.

EUSA is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while HEWJ is Japan Equities. EUSA tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index, while HEWJ tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for EUSA and 0.49% for HEWJ.

HEWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUSA and HEWJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer