PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETLX.DE vs. GLDA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETLX.DE vs. GLDA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ETLX.DE) and Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETLX.DE achieves a -3.79% return, which is significantly higher than GLDA.DE's -5.47% return.


ETLX.DE

1D
8.27%
1M
4.97%
6M
-11.78%
YTD
-3.79%
1Y
53.03%
3Y*
50.82%
5Y*
27.00%
10Y*
12.92%
ALL TIME*
7.47%

GLDA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.58%
6M
-15.18%
YTD
-5.47%
1Y
21.05%
3Y*
26.12%
5Y*
18.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
€807.89K€689.15K€1.06M
€2.06M€2.09M€2.29M

ETLX.DE vs. GLDA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ETLX.DE
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF
-3.79%152.51%27.45%11.01%-7.07%-3.33%12.25%5.82%
GLDA.DE
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)
-5.47%48.99%34.24%9.40%7.00%3.88%12.92%6.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ETLX.DE and GLDA.DE is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2019

0.71

The correlation between ETLX.DE and GLDA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETLX.DE vs. GLDA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETLX.DE
ETLX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
ETLX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDA.DE
GLDA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GLDA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETLX.DE vs. GLDA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ETLX.DE) and Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETLX.DEGLDA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.17

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

0.94

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.04

1.96

+1.07

ETLX.DE vs. GLDA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETLX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the GLDA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETLX.DE and GLDA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETLX.DE vs. GLDA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETLX.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.44%, which is greater than GLDA.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLX.DE and GLDA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETLX.DEGLDA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.44%

-22.55%

-50.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.81%

-22.55%

-14.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.81%

-22.55%

-14.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.01%

-22.55%

-19.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.86%

-21.79%

-4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.38%

-6.14%

-28.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.41%

10.74%

+6.67%

Volatility

ETLX.DE vs. GLDA.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ETLX.DE) has a higher volatility of 15.15% compared to Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.DE) at 5.98%. This indicates that ETLX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETLX.DEGLDA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.15%

5.98%

+9.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.93%

18.06%

+18.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.32%

24.75%

+24.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.15%

16.54%

+20.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.25%

16.13%

+18.12%

ETLX.DE vs. GLDA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETLX.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDA.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETLX.DE vs. GLDA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETLX.DE nor GLDA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETLX.DE and GLDA.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLDA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLDA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ETLX.DE.

ETLX.DE tracks DAXglobal® Gold Miners, while GLDA.DE tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ETLX.DE and 0.12% for GLDA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETLX.DE and GLDA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer