ETLX.DE vs. CSPX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ETLX.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L).
ETLX.DE and CSPX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETLX.DE is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal® Gold Miners. It was launched on Sep 11, 2008. CSPX.L is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 18, 2010. Both ETLX.DE and CSPX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ETLX.DE vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETLX.DE vs. CSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETLX.DE L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 10.94% | 152.55% | 27.41% | 11.05% | -7.10% | -3.32% | 12.25% | 42.55% | -5.79% | -3.18% |
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -2.62% | 3.52% | 33.52% | 22.94% | -13.69% | 39.03% | 7.93% | 33.50% | -1.02% | 6.66% |
Different Trading Currencies
ETLX.DE is traded in EUR, while CSPX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSPX.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETLX.DE achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly higher than CSPX.L's -4.93% return. Over the past 10 years, ETLX.DE has outperformed CSPX.L with an annualized return of 19.58%, while CSPX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.46% annualized return.
ETLX.DE
- 1D
- 7.67%
- 1M
- -13.88%
- YTD
- 10.94%
- 6M
- 28.07%
- 1Y
- 103.62%
- 3Y*
- 52.43%
- 5Y*
- 29.10%
- 10Y*
- 19.58%
CSPX.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.97%
- YTD
- -4.93%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- 7.74%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETLX.DE vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETLX.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETLX.DE vs. CSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
ETLX.DE
CSPX.L
ETLX.DE vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ETLX.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETLX.DE | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.24 | 0.45 | +1.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 0.72 | +1.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.10 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 2.65 | +1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.59 | 8.93 | +3.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETLX.DE | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 0.45 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.73 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.81 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.86 | -0.61 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETLX.DE and CSPX.L is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ETLX.DE vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETLX.DE nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ETLX.DE vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETLX.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.44%, which is greater than CSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLX.DE and CSPX.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETLX.DE | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.44% | -33.90% | -39.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.89% | -11.83% | -17.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.03% | -24.39% | -17.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.05% | -33.90% | -13.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.50% | -5.43% | -9.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.84% | -3.76% | -31.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.41% | 1.83% | +6.58% |
Volatility
ETLX.DE vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ETLX.DE) has a higher volatility of 18.11% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 4.16%. This indicates that ETLX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETLX.DE | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.11% | 4.16% | +13.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.49% | 9.00% | +29.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.99% | 17.03% | +28.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.47% | 15.88% | +19.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.83% | 16.61% | +17.22% |