ETHO vs. HACK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ETHO (Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF) and HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Etho Climate Leadership Index, while HACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHO returned 35.29% vs 14.12% for HACK. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for HACK.

Performance

ETHO vs. HACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHO achieves a 17.79% return, which is significantly lower than HACK's 19.40% return.

ETHO

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 2.54%
• YTD: 17.79%
• 6M: 15.68%
• 1Y: 35.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HACK

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 1.17%
• YTD: 19.40%
• 6M: 17.34%
• 1Y: 14.12%
• 3Y*: 25.16%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: 15.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHO vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	17.79%	10.23%	11.21%
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF	19.40%	7.97%	17.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHO and HACK is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2024	0.61

The correlation between ETHO and HACK shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ETHO vs. HACK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ETHO	HACK
Technology	28.7%	92.7%
Industrials	15.9%	7.2%
Healthcare	12.3%	-
Financial Services	12.2%	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	-
Real Estate	6.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	-
Communication Services	4.3%	-
Basic Materials	2.9%	-
Utilities	2.5%	-
Energy	0.3%	-

Return for Risk

ETHO vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHO

ETHO Risk / Return Rank: 70
ETHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
ETHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ETHO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
ETHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ETHO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

HACK

HACK Risk / Return Rank: 17
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHO vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETHO	HACK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	0.55	+1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	0.90	+1.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.11	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.83	0.69	+3.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.84	1.61	+13.23

ETHO vs. HACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the HACK Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHO and HACK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETHO vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHO drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, smaller than the maximum HACK drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHO and HACK.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHO	HACK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.50%	-42.68%	+17.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.25%	-20.67%	+11.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.90%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.32%	-8.93%	+7.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.43%	-11.62%	+7.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	8.80%	-6.42%

Volatility

ETHO vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) is 5.07%, while Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) has a volatility of 11.83%. This indicates that ETHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHO	HACK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	11.83%	-6.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.16%	21.94%	-8.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.89%	26.06%	-8.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.47%	24.30%	-4.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.47%	23.25%	-3.78%

ETHO vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHO vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison

ETHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than HACK's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	0.73%	0.86%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF	0.06%	0.07%	0.14%	0.20%	0.24%	0.26%	1.11%	0.14%	0.09%	0.01%	1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHO and HACK in my portfolio?

ETHO and HACK have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETHO or HACK?

HACK has higher volatility (11.83%) compared to ETHO (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHO dropped -25.50% vs HACK's -42.68%.

Which ETF is better, ETHO or HACK?

On 1-year performance, ETHO leads with 35.29% vs 14.12% for HACK. On fees, ETHO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, ETHO has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETHO or HACK?

Over the 1-year period, ETHO has performed better with a 35.29% return vs 14.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHO or HACK?

ETHO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETHO or HACK?

ETHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.

What is the main difference between ETHO and HACK?

ETHO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while HACK is Technology Equities. ETHO tracks Etho Climate Leadership Index, while HACK tracks Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ETHO and 0.60% for HACK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ETHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.