ETCO vs. ZCSH
ETCO (Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF) and ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. ETCO is actively managed, while ZCSH is passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETCO charges 0.66%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ZCSH.
Performance
ETCO vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETCO achieves a -33.38% return, which is significantly lower than ZCSH's 41.32% return.
ETCO
- 1D
- -5.43%
- 1M
- -20.32%
- YTD
- -33.38%
- 6M
- -34.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCSH
- 1D
- -5.29%
- 1M
- 47.90%
- YTD
- 41.32%
- 6M
- 72.54%
- 1Y
- 1,002.48%
- 3Y*
- 185.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETCO vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF | -33.38% | -24.78% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 41.32% | 844.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETCO and ZCSH is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETCO vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank
ETCO
ZCSH
ETCO vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF (ETCO) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETCO | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 6.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.16 | 0.10 | -1.25 |
Drawdowns
ETCO vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETCO drawdown since its inception was -56.81%, smaller than the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCO and ZCSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETCO | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.81% | -93.73% | +36.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -69.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -71.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.32% | -15.71% | -38.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.43% | -74.41% | +39.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 35.49% | — |
Volatility
ETCO vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETCO | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 48.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 94.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.49% | 166.02% | -113.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.49% | 136.87% | -84.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.49% | 136.87% | -84.38% |
ETCO vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETCO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETCO vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison
ETCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 127.41%, while ZCSH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ETCO Grayscale Ethereum Covered Call ETF | 127.41% | 42.29% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETCO and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETCO is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETCO is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.
ETCO has the higher dividend yield at 127.41%, compared with 0.00% for ZCSH.
Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ETCO and 2.50% for ZCSH.
Find the right allocation for ETCO and ZCSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer