ZCSH vs. BSOL
ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) and BSOL (Bitwise Solana Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - ZCSH tracks the Zcash (ZEC) while BSOL tracks the Solana (SOL) spot price. Both are passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZCSH charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for BSOL.
Performance
ZCSH vs. BSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZCSH achieves a -6.65% return, which is significantly higher than BSOL's -39.88% return.
ZCSH
- 1D
- 8.02%
- 1M
- -37.77%
- YTD
- -6.65%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 726.76%
- 3Y*
- 143.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSOL
- 1D
- 4.89%
- 1M
- -13.58%
- YTD
- -39.88%
- 6M
- -39.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCSH vs. BSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | -6.65% | 10.39% |
BSOL Bitwise Solana Staking ETF | -39.88% | -38.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCSH and BSOL is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCSH vs. BSOL — Risk / Return Rank
ZCSH
BSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ZCSH vs. BSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) and Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZCSH | BSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.01 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZCSH vs. BSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCSH drawdown since its inception was -93.73%, which is greater than BSOL's maximum drawdown of -67.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCSH and BSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCSH | BSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.73% | -67.62% | -26.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.32% | -62.79% | +18.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.04% | -46.84% | -27.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.60% | — | — |
Volatility
ZCSH vs. BSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCSH | BSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 64.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 107.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 174.54% | 76.28% | +98.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 138.36% | 76.28% | +62.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 138.36% | 76.28% | +62.08% |
ZCSH vs. BSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZCSH has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BSOL's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZCSH vs. BSOL - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZCSH nor BSOL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZCSH and BSOL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSOL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSOL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.
ZCSH and BSOL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC), while BSOL tracks Solana (SOL) spot price. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ZCSH and 0.20% for BSOL.
Find the right allocation for ZCSH and BSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer