ZCSH vs. BSOL
ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) and BSOL (Bitwise Solana Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - ZCSH tracks the Zcash (ZEC) while BSOL tracks the Solana (SOL) spot price. Both are passively managed. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ZCSH charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for BSOL.
Performance
ZCSH vs. BSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZCSH achieves a -1.40% return, which is significantly higher than BSOL's -39.21% return.
ZCSH
- 1D
- -5.94%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- 6M
- 46.86%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 1Y
- 888.33%
- 3Y*
- 138.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.60%
BSOL
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- -9.28%
- 6M
- -35.76%
- YTD
- -39.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.59M | $28.04M | $28.11M | |
| $1.45M | $1.75M | $3.75M |
ZCSH vs. BSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | -1.40% | 10.39% |
BSOL Bitwise Solana Staking ETF | -39.21% | -38.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCSH and BSOL is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCSH vs. BSOL — Risk / Return Rank
ZCSH
BSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ZCSH vs. BSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) and Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZCSH | BSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.08 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZCSH vs. BSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCSH drawdown since its inception was -93.73%, which is greater than BSOL's maximum drawdown of -67.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCSH and BSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCSH | BSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.73% | -67.62% | -26.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.19% | -62.38% | +21.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.19% | -48.97% | -24.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.32% | — | — |
Volatility
ZCSH vs. BSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCSH | BSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 175.09% | 73.59% | +101.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 137.54% | 73.59% | +63.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 137.54% | 73.59% | +63.95% |
ZCSH vs. BSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZCSH has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BSOL's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZCSH vs. BSOL - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZCSH nor BSOL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZCSH and BSOL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSOL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSOL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.
ZCSH and BSOL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC), while BSOL tracks Solana (SOL) spot price. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ZCSH and 0.20% for BSOL.
Find the right allocation for ZCSH and BSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer