ZCSH vs. QSOL
ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) and QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - ZCSH tracks the Zcash (ZEC) while QSOL tracks the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. Both are passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZCSH charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QSOL.
Performance
ZCSH vs. QSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZCSH achieves a 41.32% return, which is significantly higher than QSOL's -41.51% return.
ZCSH
- 1D
- -5.29%
- 1M
- 47.90%
- YTD
- 41.32%
- 6M
- 72.54%
- 1Y
- 1,002.48%
- 3Y*
- 185.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QSOL
- 1D
- -4.67%
- 1M
- -14.50%
- YTD
- -41.51%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCSH vs. QSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 41.32% | 16.19% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -41.51% | -0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCSH and QSOL is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCSH vs. QSOL — Risk / Return Rank
ZCSH
QSOL
ZCSH vs. QSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) and Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZCSH | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.49 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZCSH | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | -0.99 | +1.09 |
Drawdowns
ZCSH vs. QSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCSH drawdown since its inception was -93.73%, which is greater than QSOL's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCSH and QSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCSH | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.73% | -50.82% | -42.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.71% | -50.82% | +35.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.41% | -31.98% | -42.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.49% | — | — |
Volatility
ZCSH vs. QSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCSH | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 48.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 94.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 166.02% | 70.59% | +95.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 136.87% | 70.59% | +66.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.87% | 70.59% | +66.28% |
ZCSH vs. QSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZCSH has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QSOL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZCSH vs. QSOL - Dividend Comparison
ZCSH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.20% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZCSH and QSOL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.
QSOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.00% for ZCSH.
ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC), while QSOL tracks Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ZCSH and 0.25% for QSOL.
Find the right allocation for ZCSH and QSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer