ETCG vs. RBIL
ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETCG is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Ethereum Classic (ETC), while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETCG returned -66.78% vs 3.85% for RBIL. Their -0.11 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ETCG charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
ETCG vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETCG achieves a -47.46% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.64% return.
ETCG
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -34.35%
- YTD
- -47.46%
- 1Y
- -66.78%
- 3Y*
- -20.02%
- 5Y*
- -37.77%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -22.05%
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $62.63K | $57.03K | $104.25K | |
| $1.13M | $1.88M | $2.27M |
ETCG vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | -47.46% | -31.34% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.64% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETCG and RBIL is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETCG vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
ETCG
RBIL
ETCG vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETCG | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 2.02 | -1.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 6.87 | -7.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 27.96 | -29.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETCG vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETCG drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCG and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETCG | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.59% | -0.56% | -96.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.70% | -0.56% | -72.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.20% | -0.19% | -96.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.89% | -0.08% | -82.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.47% | 0.14% | +51.33% |
Volatility
ETCG vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) has a higher volatility of 9.74% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.31%. This indicates that ETCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETCG | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.74% | 0.31% | +9.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.37% | 0.89% | +32.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.25% | 0.96% | +56.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.69% | 1.06% | +89.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.27% | 1.06% | +113.21% |
ETCG vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETCG has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETCG vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
ETCG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.16% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETCG and RBIL have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETCG has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to RBIL (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETCG dropped -96.59% vs RBIL's -0.56%.
On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 3.85% vs -66.78% for ETCG. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 3.85% return vs -66.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 0.00% for ETCG.
ETCG is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ETCG tracks Ethereum Classic (ETC), while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and F/m. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETCG and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.02 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETCG and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer