ETCG vs. LDRI
ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) and LDRI (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETCG is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Ethereum Classic (ETC), while LDRI is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETCG returned -66.78% vs 2.90% for LDRI. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ETCG charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LDRI.
Performance
ETCG vs. LDRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETCG achieves a -47.46% return, which is significantly lower than LDRI's 1.63% return.
ETCG
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -34.35%
- YTD
- -47.46%
- 1Y
- -66.78%
- 3Y*
- -20.02%
- 5Y*
- -37.77%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -22.05%
LDRI
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 1Y
- 2.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $62.63K | $57.03K | $104.25K | |
| $135.90K | $196.88K | $205.69K |
ETCG vs. LDRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | -47.46% | -39.78% | 13.19% |
LDRI iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF | 1.63% | 5.94% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETCG and LDRI is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETCG vs. LDRI — Risk / Return Rank
ETCG
LDRI
ETCG vs. LDRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETCG | LDRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.33 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 4.62 | -5.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 11.56 | -12.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETCG vs. LDRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETCG drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, which is greater than LDRI's maximum drawdown of -0.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCG and LDRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETCG | LDRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.59% | -0.85% | -95.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.70% | -0.63% | -72.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.20% | -0.33% | -95.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.89% | -0.21% | -82.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.47% | 0.25% | +51.22% |
Volatility
ETCG vs. LDRI - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) has a higher volatility of 9.74% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) at 0.45%. This indicates that ETCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETCG | LDRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.74% | 0.45% | +9.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.37% | 1.21% | +32.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.25% | 1.83% | +55.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.69% | 2.25% | +88.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.27% | 2.25% | +112.02% |
ETCG vs. LDRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETCG has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRI's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETCG vs. LDRI - Dividend Comparison
ETCG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDRI iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF | 5.02% | 4.23% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETCG and LDRI have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETCG has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to LDRI (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETCG dropped -96.59% vs LDRI's -0.85%.
On 1-year performance, LDRI leads with 2.90% vs -66.78% for ETCG. On fees, LDRI is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, LDRI has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LDRI has performed better with a 2.90% return vs -66.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LDRI is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.
LDRI has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 0.00% for ETCG.
ETCG is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while LDRI is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ETCG tracks Ethereum Classic (ETC), while LDRI tracks BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder Index. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and iShares. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETCG and 0.10% for LDRI.
LDRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETCG and LDRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer