ETCG vs. ISCMF
ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETCG is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Ethereum Classic (ETC), while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ETCG returned -20.02%/yr vs 10.24%/yr for ISCMF. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ETCG charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
ETCG vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETCG achieves a -47.46% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 11.96% return.
ETCG
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -34.35%
- YTD
- -47.46%
- 1Y
- -66.78%
- 3Y*
- -20.02%
- 5Y*
- -37.77%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -22.05%
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 21.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $62.63K | $57.03K | $104.25K | |
| $0.00 | $7.90K | $54.64K |
ETCG vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | -47.46% | -39.78% | -9.57% | 289.22% | -68.42% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 11.96% | 19.65% | 3.13% | -9.58% | -5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETCG and ISCMF is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022 | -0.01 |
The correlation between ETCG and ISCMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.00 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETCG vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
ETCG
ISCMF
ETCG vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETCG | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.81 | -1.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 1.59 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 4.77 | -6.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETCG vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETCG drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCG and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETCG | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.59% | -25.42% | -71.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.70% | -13.68% | -59.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.25% | -13.68% | -68.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.20% | -13.68% | -82.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.89% | -13.31% | -69.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.47% | 4.69% | +46.78% |
Volatility
ETCG vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) has a higher volatility of 9.74% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 0.00%. This indicates that ETCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETCG | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.74% | 0.00% | +9.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.37% | 17.04% | +16.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.25% | 19.57% | +37.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.69% | 14.73% | +75.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.27% | 14.73% | +99.54% |
ETCG vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETCG has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETCG vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETCG nor ISCMF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETCG and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETCG has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to ISCMF (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETCG dropped -96.59% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.
On 3-year performance, ISCMF leads with 10.24% vs -20.02% for ETCG. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 10.24% return vs -20.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.
ETCG and ISCMF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ETCG is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ISCMF is Commodities. ETCG tracks Ethereum Classic (ETC), while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and iShares. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETCG and 0.19% for ISCMF.
ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETCG and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer