ETCG vs. EZET

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) and EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - ETCG tracks the Ethereum Classic (ETC) while EZET tracks the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETCG returned -59.15% vs -37.01% for EZET. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETCG charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZET.

Performance

ETCG vs. EZET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETCG achieves a -38.98% return, which is significantly lower than EZET's -35.30% return.

ETCG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.70%
• 6M: -45.78%
• YTD: -38.98%
• 1Y: -59.15%
• 3Y*: -19.19%
• 5Y*: -32.50%
• 10Y*: —

EZET

• 1D: 2.46%
• 1M: 5.66%
• 6M: -43.24%
• YTD: -35.30%
• 1Y: -37.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETCG vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)	-38.98%	-39.78%	-3.98%
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-35.30%	-11.23%	-4.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ETCG and EZET is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	0.69

The correlation between ETCG and EZET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ETCG vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETCG

ETCG Risk / Return Rank: 2
ETCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
ETCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
ETCG Omega Ratio Rank: 2
ETCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
ETCG Martin Ratio Rank: 3

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 5
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETCG vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETCG	EZET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	-0.54	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.74	-0.48	-1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	0.95	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	-0.55	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	-0.85	-0.36

ETCG vs. EZET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETCG Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the EZET Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETCG and EZET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETCG vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETCG drawdown since its inception was -96.59%, which is greater than EZET's maximum drawdown of -67.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETCG and EZET.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETCG	EZET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.59%	-67.89%	-28.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.23%	-67.89%	-1.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-79.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.59%	-60.34%	-35.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.80%	-34.58%	-48.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.94%	43.38%	+5.56%

Volatility

ETCG vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) is 11.22%, while Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a volatility of 16.65%. This indicates that ETCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETCG	EZET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.22%	16.65%	-5.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.23%	47.44%	-11.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.68%	68.43%	-6.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	91.85%	71.95%	+19.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	114.62%	71.95%	+42.67%

ETCG vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETCG has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETCG vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETCG nor EZET has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETCG and EZET in my portfolio?

ETCG and EZET have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETCG or EZET?

EZET has higher volatility (16.65%) compared to ETCG (11.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETCG dropped -96.59% vs EZET's -67.89%.

Which ETF is better, ETCG or EZET?

On 1-year performance, EZET leads with -37.01% vs -59.15% for ETCG. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ETCG has been the lower-risk option at 11.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETCG or EZET?

Over the 1-year period, EZET has performed better with a -37.01% return vs -59.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETCG or EZET?

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETCG or EZET?

ETCG and EZET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ETCG and EZET?

ETCG tracks Ethereum Classic (ETC), while EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETCG and 0.19% for EZET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EZET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.54 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.