ESPO vs. IAK
ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while IAK is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPO returned 5.49%/yr vs 13.37%/yr for IAK. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IAK.
Performance
ESPO vs. IAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -15.10% return, which is significantly lower than IAK's 1.11% return.
ESPO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- YTD
- -15.10%
- 6M
- -16.17%
- 1Y
- -14.92%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- —
IAK
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
ESPO vs. IAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -15.10% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.49% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 1.11% | 9.50% | 28.25% | 11.28% | 11.33% | 26.84% | -2.86% | 25.94% | -7.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO and IAK is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ESPO and IAK has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ESPO vs. IAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPO
IAK
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
ESPO
IAK
-
Consumer Cyclical
ESPO
IAK
-
Technology
ESPO
IAK
-
Basic Materials
ESPO
-
IAK
-
Consumer Defensive
ESPO
-
IAK
-
Energy
ESPO
-
IAK
-
Financial Services
ESPO
-
IAK
Healthcare
ESPO
-
IAK
Industrials
ESPO
-
IAK
-
Real Estate
ESPO
-
IAK
-
Utilities
ESPO
-
IAK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO vs. IAK — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO
IAK
ESPO vs. IAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESPO | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.06 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 0.57 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | 1.27 | -2.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESPO vs. IAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum IAK drawdown of -77.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and IAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -77.38% | +26.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.81% | -7.62% | -20.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.81% | -11.58% | -16.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.33% | -14.76% | -33.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.19% | -0.23% | -26.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -16.11% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.95% | 3.41% | +12.54% |
Volatility
ESPO vs. IAK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is 4.42%, while iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that ESPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 5.49% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.67% | 10.75% | +3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.83% | 15.10% | +3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.10% | 18.14% | +6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.71% | 20.92% | +4.79% |
ESPO vs. IAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IAK's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO vs. IAK - Dividend Comparison
ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than IAK's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.47% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.60% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPO and IAK have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAK has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to ESPO (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs IAK's -77.38%.
On 5-year performance, IAK leads with 13.37% vs 5.49% for ESPO. On fees, IAK is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IAK has performed better with a 13.37% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAK is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.47% for ESPO.
ESPO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IAK is Financials Equities. ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.43% for IAK.
IAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESPO and IAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer