ESPO vs. BBUS
ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - ESPO tracks the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPO returned 6.23%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BBUS. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
ESPO vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -13.31% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 10.60% return.
ESPO
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -13.31%
- 6M
- -16.99%
- 1Y
- -11.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
ESPO vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -13.31% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 25.72% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO and BBUS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019 | 0.70 |
The correlation between ESPO and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESPO vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPO
BBUS
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
ESPO
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
ESPO
BBUS
Technology
ESPO
BBUS
Basic Materials
ESPO
-
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
ESPO
-
BBUS
Energy
ESPO
-
BBUS
Financial Services
ESPO
-
BBUS
Healthcare
ESPO
-
BBUS
Industrials
ESPO
-
BBUS
Real Estate
ESPO
-
BBUS
Utilities
ESPO
-
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO
BBUS
ESPO vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPO | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.42 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 3.00 | -3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 13.76 | -14.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPO | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | 2.33 | -2.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.79 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.84 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
ESPO vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -35.35% | -15.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.81% | -9.21% | -18.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.81% | -19.01% | -8.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.33% | -25.46% | -22.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.66% | -0.74% | -24.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -5.46% | -9.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.30% | 2.00% | +13.30% |
Volatility
ESPO vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that ESPO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 2.88% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.58% | 8.96% | +5.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.85% | 11.87% | +6.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 17.03% | +8.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.75% | 19.59% | +6.16% |
ESPO vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% |
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.44% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPO and BBUS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESPO has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 6.23% for ESPO. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 6.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.
ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESPO and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer