ESPO vs. AGQ
ESPO (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF) and AGQ (ProShares Ultra Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPO is a Gaming fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while AGQ is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPO returned 8.32%/yr vs 8.02%/yr for AGQ. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ESPO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for AGQ.
Performance
ESPO vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPO achieves a -9.09% return, which is significantly higher than AGQ's -58.79% return.
ESPO
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- 6M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -9.09%
- 1Y
- -11.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.59%
AGQ
- 1D
- -4.43%
- 1M
- -6.44%
- 6M
- -60.08%
- YTD
- -58.79%
- 1Y
- 31.87%
- 3Y*
- 28.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.02%
- 10Y*
- 1.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $125.84M | $135.44M | $281.05M | |
| $1.98M | $1.50M | $1.55M |
ESPO vs. AGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -9.09% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.49% |
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | -58.79% | 360.71% | 23.92% | -15.09% | -7.89% | -32.25% | 62.02% | 20.02% | 9.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO and AGQ is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.24 |
The correlation between ESPO and AGQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO vs. AGQ — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO
AGQ
ESPO vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESPO | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.19 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 0.38 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 0.62 | -1.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESPO vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPO drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO and AGQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -98.16% | +47.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.43% | -85.13% | +55.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.43% | -85.13% | +55.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.33% | -85.13% | +36.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -85.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.03% | -91.25% | +69.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.23% | -79.93% | +64.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.32% | 51.43% | -33.11% |
Volatility
ESPO vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is 6.66%, while ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a volatility of 22.86%. This indicates that ESPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 22.86% | -16.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.07% | 127.92% | -111.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.65% | 125.49% | -105.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.12% | 76.26% | -51.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 66.42% | -40.77% |
ESPO vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison
ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while AGQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.37% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPO and AGQ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGQ has higher volatility (22.86%) compared to ESPO (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESPO dropped -50.99% vs AGQ's -98.16%.
On 5-year performance, ESPO leads with 8.32% vs 8.02% for AGQ. On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 6.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESPO has performed better with a 8.32% return vs 8.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.93% for AGQ.
ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for AGQ.
ESPO is categorized as Gaming, while AGQ is Silver. ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index, while AGQ tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO and 0.93% for AGQ.
AGQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESPO and AGQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer