PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESPJ.L vs. CPJ1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESPJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPJ.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESPJ.L is traded in USD, while CPJ1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CPJ1.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESPJ.L achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than CPJ1.L's 8.56% return.


ESPJ.L

1D
-0.81%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
6.36%
6M
7.75%
1Y
13.44%
3Y*
12.26%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*

CPJ1.L

1D
-0.55%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
8.56%
6M
10.43%
1Y
16.37%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
7.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESPJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESPJ.L
Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc
6.36%18.97%5.95%5.75%-7.36%1.74%
CPJ1.L
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc
8.56%20.50%5.11%5.44%-6.35%1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ESPJ.L and CPJ1.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2021

0.93

The correlation between ESPJ.L and CPJ1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESPJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESPJ.L
CPJ1.L

Financial Services

50.8%
45.5%

Basic Materials

10.6%
15.5%

Real Estate

7.8%
7.9%

Industrials

7.3%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
6.1%

Healthcare

4.6%
3.2%

Energy

3.2%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
2.9%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.9%

Utilities

2.2%
3.6%

Technology

1.5%
1.1%

Financial Services

ESPJ.L
50.8%
CPJ1.L
45.5%

Basic Materials

ESPJ.L
10.6%
CPJ1.L
15.5%

Real Estate

ESPJ.L
7.8%
CPJ1.L
7.9%

Industrials

ESPJ.L
7.3%
CPJ1.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ESPJ.L
6.7%
CPJ1.L
6.1%

Healthcare

ESPJ.L
4.6%
CPJ1.L
3.2%

Energy

ESPJ.L
3.2%
CPJ1.L
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

ESPJ.L
2.7%
CPJ1.L
2.9%

Communication Services

ESPJ.L
2.7%
CPJ1.L
2.9%

Utilities

ESPJ.L
2.2%
CPJ1.L
3.6%

Technology

ESPJ.L
1.5%
CPJ1.L
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESPJ.L vs. CPJ1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESPJ.L
ESPJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ESPJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

CPJ1.L
CPJ1.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CPJ1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPJ1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESPJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPJ.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESPJ.LCPJ1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.22

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

1.85

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.71

5.89

-1.18

ESPJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESPJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the CPJ1.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESPJ.L and CPJ1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESPJ.LCPJ1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

1.23

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.29

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.34

-0.01

Drawdowns

ESPJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESPJ.L drawdown since its inception was -24.49%, smaller than the maximum CPJ1.L drawdown of -38.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPJ.L and CPJ1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESPJ.LCPJ1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.49%

-38.55%

+14.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-8.80%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.13%

-18.64%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

-25.47%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.22%

-3.39%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-8.31%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.77%

+0.07%

Volatility

ESPJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPJ.L) and iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) have volatilities of 4.45% and 4.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESPJ.LCPJ1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

4.27%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.75%

10.72%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

13.28%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

16.89%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

17.77%

-1.00%

ESPJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESPJ.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CPJ1.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESPJ.L vs. CPJ1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESPJ.L nor CPJ1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, ESPJ.L and CPJ1.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ESPJ.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESPJ.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CPJ1.L.

ESPJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan Universal Select Business Screens Index, while CPJ1.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ESPJ.L and 0.20% for CPJ1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESPJ.L and CPJ1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer