ESPJ.L vs. EQQU.L
ESPJ.L (Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and EQQU.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESPJ.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific ex Japan Universal Select Business Screens Index, while EQQU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESPJ.L returned 4.51%/yr vs 17.59%/yr for EQQU.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESPJ.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQU.L.
Performance
ESPJ.L vs. EQQU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPJ.L achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than EQQU.L's 19.55% return.
ESPJ.L
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- 13.44%
- 3Y*
- 12.26%
- 5Y*
- 4.51%
- 10Y*
- —
EQQU.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 8.49%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 6M
- 19.04%
- 1Y
- 40.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.98%
- 5Y*
- 17.59%
- 10Y*
- 21.19%
ESPJ.L vs. EQQU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPJ.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 6.36% | 18.97% | 5.95% | 5.75% | -7.36% | 1.74% |
EQQU.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 19.55% | 19.75% | 26.54% | 56.27% | -33.46% | 26.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPJ.L and EQQU.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between ESPJ.L and EQQU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESPJ.L vs. EQQU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPJ.L
EQQU.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
ESPJ.L
EQQU.L
Basic Materials
ESPJ.L
EQQU.L
Real Estate
ESPJ.L
EQQU.L
Industrials
ESPJ.L
EQQU.L
Consumer Cyclical
ESPJ.L
EQQU.L
Healthcare
ESPJ.L
EQQU.L
Energy
ESPJ.L
EQQU.L
Consumer Defensive
ESPJ.L
EQQU.L
Communication Services
ESPJ.L
EQQU.L
Utilities
ESPJ.L
EQQU.L
Technology
ESPJ.L
EQQU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPJ.L vs. EQQU.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESPJ.L
EQQU.L
ESPJ.L vs. EQQU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPJ.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPJ.L | EQQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.43 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 3.64 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.71 | 13.04 | -8.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPJ.L | EQQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 2.52 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.85 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.95 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
ESPJ.L vs. EQQU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPJ.L drawdown since its inception was -24.49%, smaller than the maximum EQQU.L drawdown of -35.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPJ.L and EQQU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPJ.L | EQQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.49% | -35.17% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.66% | -11.00% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.13% | -22.30% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.49% | -35.17% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | -0.77% | -3.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.91% | -6.10% | -0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.08% | -0.24% |
Volatility
ESPJ.L vs. EQQU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPJ.L) is 4.45%, while Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that ESPJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPJ.L | EQQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 4.93% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.75% | 11.88% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.42% | 15.88% | -2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 20.76% | -3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 19.97% | -3.20% |
ESPJ.L vs. EQQU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPJ.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPJ.L vs. EQQU.L - Dividend Comparison
ESPJ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQU.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 0.23% | 0.29% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.56% | 0.26% | 0.11% |
ESPJ.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPJ.L and EQQU.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESPJ.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESPJ.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQU.L.
ESPJ.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EQQU.L is Nasdaq-100. ESPJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan Universal Select Business Screens Index, while EQQU.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ESPJ.L and 0.30% for EQQU.L.
Find the right allocation for ESPJ.L and EQQU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer