CPJ1.L vs. AGES.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (AGES.L).
CPJ1.L and AGES.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CPJ1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Jan 12, 2010. AGES.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 8, 2016. Both CPJ1.L and AGES.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CPJ1.L or AGES.L.
Key characteristics
CPJ1.L | AGES.L | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 8.60% | 12.47% |
1Y Return | 16.17% | 23.63% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 3.60% | 2.28% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 4.05% | 5.71% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.39 | 2.25 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.01 | 3.15 |
Omega Ratio | 1.24 | 1.41 |
Calmar Ratio | 1.18 | 1.69 |
Martin Ratio | 6.54 | 13.66 |
Ulcer Index | 2.71% | 1.79% |
Daily Std Dev | 12.78% | 10.87% |
Max Drawdown | -32.49% | -31.02% |
Current Drawdown | -1.93% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPJ1.L and AGES.L is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CPJ1.L vs. AGES.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CPJ1.L achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than AGES.L's 12.47% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CPJ1.L vs. AGES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPJ1.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AGES.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CPJ1.L vs. AGES.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (AGES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CPJ1.L vs. AGES.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CPJ1.L nor AGES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CPJ1.L vs. AGES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPJ1.L drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, roughly equal to the maximum AGES.L drawdown of -31.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPJ1.L and AGES.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CPJ1.L vs. AGES.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (AGES.L) at 3.07%. This indicates that CPJ1.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.