CPJ1.L vs. IUKD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF (IUKD.L).
CPJ1.L and IUKD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CPJ1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Jan 12, 2010. IUKD.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE UK Dividend+ Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2005. Both CPJ1.L and IUKD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CPJ1.L or IUKD.L.
Key characteristics
| CPJ1.L | IUKD.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.31% | 10.96% |
| 1Y Return | 7.85% | 15.52% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.24% | 7.05% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.15% | 6.24% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.45% | 3.68% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.54 | 1.17 |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.75% | 13.12% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.49% | -62.02% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.53% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPJ1.L and IUKD.L is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CPJ1.L vs. IUKD.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CPJ1.L achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than IUKD.L's 10.96% return. Over the past 10 years, CPJ1.L has outperformed IUKD.L with an annualized return of 6.45%, while IUKD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.68% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CPJ1.L vs. IUKD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPJ1.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IUKD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CPJ1.L vs. IUKD.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF (IUKD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CPJ1.L vs. IUKD.L - Dividend Comparison
CPJ1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IUKD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPJ1.L iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IUKD.L iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.05% | 0.04% |
Drawdowns
CPJ1.L vs. IUKD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPJ1.L drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum IUKD.L drawdown of -62.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPJ1.L and IUKD.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CPJ1.L vs. IUKD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF (IUKD.L) at 2.78%. This indicates that CPJ1.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUKD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.