CPJ1.L vs. PADV.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (PADV.L).
CPJ1.L and PADV.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CPJ1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Jan 12, 2010. PADV.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. It was launched on May 14, 2013. Both CPJ1.L and PADV.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CPJ1.L or PADV.L.
Key characteristics
| CPJ1.L | PADV.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.28% | 6.98% |
| 1Y Return | 7.45% | 14.93% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.06% | 3.76% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.14% | 3.74% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.53% | 7.94% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.49 | 1.08 |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.72% | 13.43% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.49% | -27.09% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.56% | -0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPJ1.L and PADV.L is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CPJ1.L vs. PADV.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CPJ1.L achieves a 4.28% return, which is significantly lower than PADV.L's 6.98% return. Over the past 10 years, CPJ1.L has underperformed PADV.L with an annualized return of 6.53%, while PADV.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.94% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CPJ1.L vs. PADV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPJ1.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PADV.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CPJ1.L vs. PADV.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (PADV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CPJ1.L vs. PADV.L - Dividend Comparison
CPJ1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PADV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPJ1.L iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PADV.L SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 2.63% | 2.93% | 3.44% | 2.89% | 2.96% | 2.79% | 87.74% | 61.14% | 2.14% | 5.24% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
CPJ1.L vs. PADV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPJ1.L drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, which is greater than PADV.L's maximum drawdown of -27.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPJ1.L and PADV.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CPJ1.L vs. PADV.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares VII plc - iShares Core MSCI Pac ex-Jpn ETF USD Acc (CPJ1.L) and SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (PADV.L) have volatilities of 4.05% and 4.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.