PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESPJ.L vs. ESPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESPJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPJ.L) and Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESPJ.L is traded in USD, while ESPS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ESPS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ESPJ.L having a 7.22% return and ESPS.L slightly lower at 7.16%.


ESPJ.L

1D
-0.73%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
7.22%
6M
9.05%
1Y
15.32%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*

ESPS.L

1D
-0.69%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
7.16%
6M
8.87%
1Y
15.23%
3Y*
12.50%
5Y*
5.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESPJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESPJ.L
Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc
7.22%18.97%5.95%5.75%-7.36%3.83%
ESPS.L
Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc
7.10%18.50%5.81%7.20%-8.84%4.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ESPJ.L and ESPS.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021

0.54

Over the past year, ESPJ.L and ESPS.L have become more correlated (0.93) than their long-term average of 0.54, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ESPJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESPJ.L
ESPS.L

Financial Services

50.8%
50.7%

Basic Materials

10.6%
11.6%

Real Estate

7.8%
7.8%

Industrials

7.3%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
6.8%

Healthcare

4.6%
4.0%

Energy

3.2%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
2.6%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.6%

Utilities

2.2%
2.2%

Technology

1.5%
1.4%

Financial Services

ESPJ.L
50.8%
ESPS.L
50.7%

Basic Materials

ESPJ.L
10.6%
ESPS.L
11.6%

Real Estate

ESPJ.L
7.8%
ESPS.L
7.8%

Industrials

ESPJ.L
7.3%
ESPS.L
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ESPJ.L
6.7%
ESPS.L
6.8%

Healthcare

ESPJ.L
4.6%
ESPS.L
4.0%

Energy

ESPJ.L
3.2%
ESPS.L
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

ESPJ.L
2.7%
ESPS.L
2.6%

Communication Services

ESPJ.L
2.7%
ESPS.L
2.6%

Utilities

ESPJ.L
2.2%
ESPS.L
2.2%

Technology

ESPJ.L
1.5%
ESPS.L
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESPJ.L vs. ESPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESPJ.L
ESPJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ESPJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

ESPS.L
ESPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ESPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESPJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPJ.L) and Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESPJ.LESPS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.21

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

1.67

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.39

5.25

+0.14

ESPJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESPJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the ESPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESPJ.L and ESPS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESPJ.LESPS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.17

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.39

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.51

-0.17

Drawdowns

ESPJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESPJ.L drawdown since its inception was -24.49%, which is greater than ESPS.L's maximum drawdown of -22.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPJ.L and ESPS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESPJ.LESPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.49%

-22.90%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-9.09%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.13%

-19.21%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

-22.90%

-1.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.44%

-3.68%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-5.61%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.89%

-0.06%

Volatility

ESPJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPJ.L) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) at 3.98%. This indicates that ESPJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESPJ.LESPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

3.98%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.72%

10.40%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

13.02%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

23.67%

-6.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

23.70%

-6.93%

ESPJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ESPJ.L and ESPS.L have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESPJ.L vs. ESPS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESPJ.L nor ESPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, ESPJ.L and ESPS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESPJ.L and ESPS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

ESPJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan Universal Select Business Screens Index, while ESPS.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESPJ.L and ESPS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer