PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESML vs. SMMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESML vs. SMMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESML achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly higher than SMMV's 2.04% return.


ESML

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.86%
YTD
16.26%
6M
15.99%
1Y
34.21%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*

SMMV

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.47%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.90%
1Y
6.20%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
4.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESML vs. SMMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ESML
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF
16.26%10.62%12.01%17.27%-17.28%19.28%19.56%29.12%-10.89%
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
2.04%6.42%18.29%5.63%-10.00%16.64%-2.88%24.21%0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between ESML and SMMV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2018

0.88

The correlation between ESML and SMMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESML vs. SMMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESML
SMMV

Industrials

19.3%
13.8%

Technology

17.5%
10.9%

Financial Services

14.4%
10.9%

Healthcare

12.6%
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
5.6%

Real Estate

6.5%
13.4%

Energy

5.9%
4.5%

Basic Materials

3.9%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
8.1%

Utilities

2.7%
7.7%

Communication Services

2.2%
5.4%

Industrials

ESML
19.3%
SMMV
13.8%

Technology

ESML
17.5%
SMMV
10.9%

Financial Services

ESML
14.4%
SMMV
10.9%

Healthcare

ESML
12.6%
SMMV
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ESML
11.3%
SMMV
5.6%

Real Estate

ESML
6.5%
SMMV
13.4%

Energy

ESML
5.9%
SMMV
4.5%

Basic Materials

ESML
3.9%
SMMV
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

ESML
3.7%
SMMV
8.1%

Utilities

ESML
2.7%
SMMV
7.7%

Communication Services

ESML
2.2%
SMMV
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESML vs. SMMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESML
ESML Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ESML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESML Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESML Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ESML Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESML Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SMMV
SMMV Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SMMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESML vs. SMMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESMLSMMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.11

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

0.89

+2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.00

2.82

+11.17

ESML vs. SMMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESML Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the SMMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESML and SMMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESMLSMMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

0.64

+1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.36

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.52

-0.06

Drawdowns

ESML vs. SMMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESML drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, which is greater than SMMV's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESML and SMMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESMLSMMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.97%

-38.77%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-7.02%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.68%

-13.68%

-13.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.61%

-18.00%

-10.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-4.44%

+3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.97%

-5.10%

-3.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.20%

+0.25%

Volatility

ESML vs. SMMV - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) at 2.27%. This indicates that ESML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESMLSMMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

2.27%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

6.30%

+5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.66%

9.73%

+6.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.23%

13.50%

+7.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.40%

15.69%

+7.71%

ESML vs. SMMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESML has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than SMMV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESML vs. SMMV - Dividend Comparison

ESML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than SMMV's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESML
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF
0.95%1.08%1.22%1.31%1.46%0.94%0.99%1.10%1.07%0.00%0.00%
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
1.75%1.77%1.76%2.30%1.67%1.08%1.39%1.64%1.72%1.63%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESML and SMMV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESML has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to SMMV (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESML dropped -41.97% vs SMMV's -38.77%.

On 5-year performance, ESML leads with 7.18% vs 4.87% for SMMV. On fees, ESML is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESML has performed better with a 7.18% return vs 4.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESML is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SMMV.

SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.95% for ESML.

ESML tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index, while SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for ESML and 0.20% for SMMV.

ESML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESML and SMMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer