PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESML vs. SMMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESML vs. SMMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESML achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly lower than SMMD's 18.37% return.


ESML

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.86%
YTD
16.26%
6M
15.99%
1Y
34.21%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*

SMMD

1D
-0.63%
1M
4.41%
YTD
18.37%
6M
18.20%
1Y
36.03%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESML vs. SMMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ESML
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF
16.26%10.62%12.01%17.27%-17.28%19.28%19.56%29.12%-10.89%
SMMD
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
18.37%11.72%11.87%17.71%-18.53%18.30%19.98%28.01%-10.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ESML and SMMD is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2018

0.98

The correlation between ESML and SMMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESML vs. SMMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESML
SMMD

Industrials

19.3%
21.0%

Technology

17.5%
18.8%

Financial Services

14.4%
13.8%

Healthcare

12.6%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
10.6%

Real Estate

6.5%
6.7%

Energy

5.9%
4.9%

Basic Materials

3.9%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
2.8%

Utilities

2.7%
2.7%

Communication Services

2.2%
2.5%

Industrials

ESML
19.3%
SMMD
21.0%

Technology

ESML
17.5%
SMMD
18.8%

Financial Services

ESML
14.4%
SMMD
13.8%

Healthcare

ESML
12.6%
SMMD
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ESML
11.3%
SMMD
10.6%

Real Estate

ESML
6.5%
SMMD
6.7%

Energy

ESML
5.9%
SMMD
4.9%

Basic Materials

ESML
3.9%
SMMD
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

ESML
3.7%
SMMD
2.8%

Utilities

ESML
2.7%
SMMD
2.7%

Communication Services

ESML
2.2%
SMMD
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESML vs. SMMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESML
ESML Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ESML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESML Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESML Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ESML Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESML Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SMMD
SMMD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SMMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMD Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESML vs. SMMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESMLSMMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

3.75

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.00

14.29

-0.30

ESML vs. SMMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESML Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the SMMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESML and SMMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESMLSMMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.11

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.37

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.50

-0.04

Drawdowns

ESML vs. SMMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESML drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, roughly equal to the maximum SMMD drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESML and SMMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESMLSMMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.97%

-41.06%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-9.66%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.68%

-25.50%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.61%

-28.26%

-0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.63%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.97%

-8.37%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.53%

-0.08%

Volatility

ESML vs. SMMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) is 4.25%, while iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that ESML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESMLSMMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

5.17%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

12.58%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.66%

17.20%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.23%

20.82%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.40%

22.37%

+1.03%

ESML vs. SMMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESML has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SMMD's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESML vs. SMMD - Dividend Comparison

ESML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than SMMD's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESML
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF
0.95%1.08%1.22%1.31%1.46%0.94%0.99%1.10%1.07%0.00%
SMMD
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
1.05%1.28%1.27%1.44%1.79%1.12%1.31%1.50%2.45%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, ESML and SMMD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SMMD has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to ESML (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESML dropped -41.97% vs SMMD's -41.06%.

On 5-year performance, SMMD leads with 7.64% vs 7.18% for ESML. On fees, SMMD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ESML has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SMMD has performed better with a 7.64% return vs 7.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMMD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for ESML.

SMMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.95% for ESML.

ESML tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index, while SMMD tracks Russell 2500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for ESML and 0.15% for SMMD.

SMMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESML and SMMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer