ESML vs. SMMD
ESML (iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF) and SMMD (iShares Russell 2500 ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds from iShares - ESML tracks the MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index while SMMD tracks the Russell 2500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESML returned 7.18%/yr vs 7.64%/yr for SMMD. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ESML charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SMMD.
Performance
ESML vs. SMMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESML achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly lower than SMMD's 18.37% return.
ESML
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 16.26%
- 6M
- 15.99%
- 1Y
- 34.21%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- —
SMMD
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 18.37%
- 6M
- 18.20%
- 1Y
- 36.03%
- 3Y*
- 18.53%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- —
ESML vs. SMMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | 16.26% | 10.62% | 12.01% | 17.27% | -17.28% | 19.28% | 19.56% | 29.12% | -10.89% |
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 18.37% | 11.72% | 11.87% | 17.71% | -18.53% | 18.30% | 19.98% | 28.01% | -10.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESML and SMMD is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2018 | 0.98 |
The correlation between ESML and SMMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESML vs. SMMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESML
SMMD
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
ESML
SMMD
Technology
ESML
SMMD
Financial Services
ESML
SMMD
Healthcare
ESML
SMMD
Consumer Cyclical
ESML
SMMD
Real Estate
ESML
SMMD
Energy
ESML
SMMD
Basic Materials
ESML
SMMD
Consumer Defensive
ESML
SMMD
Utilities
ESML
SMMD
Communication Services
ESML
SMMD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESML vs. SMMD — Risk / Return Rank
ESML
SMMD
ESML vs. SMMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESML | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 3.75 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.00 | 14.29 | -0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESML | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 2.11 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.37 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.50 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
ESML vs. SMMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESML drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, roughly equal to the maximum SMMD drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESML and SMMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESML | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.97% | -41.06% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -9.66% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.68% | -25.50% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.61% | -28.26% | -0.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -0.63% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.97% | -8.37% | -0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 2.53% | -0.08% |
Volatility
ESML vs. SMMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) is 4.25%, while iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that ESML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESML | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 5.17% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 12.58% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.66% | 17.20% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 20.82% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.40% | 22.37% | +1.03% |
ESML vs. SMMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESML has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SMMD's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESML vs. SMMD - Dividend Comparison
ESML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than SMMD's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | 0.95% | 1.08% | 1.22% | 1.31% | 1.46% | 0.94% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.07% | 0.00% |
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.28% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.79% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.50% | 2.45% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, ESML and SMMD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SMMD has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to ESML (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESML dropped -41.97% vs SMMD's -41.06%.
On 5-year performance, SMMD leads with 7.64% vs 7.18% for ESML. On fees, SMMD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ESML has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMMD has performed better with a 7.64% return vs 7.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMMD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for ESML.
SMMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.95% for ESML.
ESML tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index, while SMMD tracks Russell 2500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for ESML and 0.15% for SMMD.
SMMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESML and SMMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer