ESLT vs. CCJ
ESLT (Elbit Systems Ltd) and CCJ (Cameco Corporation) are both stocks. ESLT operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while CCJ operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 10 years, ESLT returned 25.96%/yr vs 25.85%/yr for CCJ. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESLT vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESLT achieves a 43.85% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's 15.25% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ESLT having a 25.96% annualized return and CCJ not far behind at 25.85%.
ESLT
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- 43.85%
- 6M
- 71.50%
- 1Y
- 98.59%
- 3Y*
- 60.25%
- 5Y*
- 45.92%
- 10Y*
- 25.96%
CCJ
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -9.69%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 74.85%
- 3Y*
- 51.07%
- 5Y*
- 37.97%
- 10Y*
- 25.85%
ESLT vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd | 43.85% | 125.14% | 22.17% | 31.30% | -4.82% | 34.77% | -14.56% | 37.62% | -13.22% | 32.65% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 15.25% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 90.49% | 4.35% | 63.19% | 51.47% | -21.08% | 23.58% | -8.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESLT and CCJ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 1996 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
ESLT:
$39.95B
CCJ:
$45.93B
ESLT:
$12.36
CCJ:
$1.49
ESLT:
67.15
CCJ:
70.56
ESLT:
3.18
CCJ:
0.59
ESLT:
4.80
CCJ:
12.97
ESLT:
9.38
CCJ:
6.49
ESLT:
$8.23B
CCJ:
$3.54B
ESLT:
$2.03B
CCJ:
$1.04B
ESLT:
$861.06M
CCJ:
$996.66M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESLT vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank
ESLT
CCJ
ESLT vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESLT | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.25 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 2.93 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.82 | 6.51 | +4.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESLT | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 1.35 | +1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.39 | 0.77 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.56 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.23 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
ESLT vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESLT drawdown since its inception was -53.79%, smaller than the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESLT and CCJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESLT | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.79% | -87.53% | +33.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.98% | -25.69% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.98% | -40.01% | +14.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.89% | -40.01% | +7.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.89% | -57.22% | +24.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.07% | -21.37% | +3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.92% | -46.09% | +32.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.14% | 11.54% | -2.40% |
Volatility
ESLT vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ) have volatilities of 15.36% and 15.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESLT | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.36% | 15.98% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.61% | 39.04% | -5.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.26% | 55.87% | -13.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.13% | 49.87% | -16.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.13% | 46.69% | -17.56% |
Dividends
ESLT vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
ESLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, more than CCJ's 0.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd | 0.37% | 0.47% | 0.77% | 0.94% | 1.22% | 1.03% | 1.28% | 1.14% | 1.54% | 1.32% | 1.57% | 1.63% |
Financials
ESLT vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Elbit Systems Ltd and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ESLT vs. CCJ - Profitability Comparison
ESLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a gross profit of 552.06M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.
CCJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.00M and revenue of 847.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.
ESLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported an operating income of 205.13M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
CCJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 154.28M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
ESLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a net income of 160.79M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
CCJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 131.09M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESLT and CCJ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCJ has higher volatility (15.98%) compared to ESLT (15.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESLT dropped -53.79% vs CCJ's -87.53%.
ESLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESLT and CCJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer