PortfoliosLab logo
ESLT vs. LHX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ESLT and LHX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ESLT vs. LHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ESLT:

3.15

LHX:

0.60

Sortino Ratio

ESLT:

3.85

LHX:

0.93

Omega Ratio

ESLT:

1.56

LHX:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

ESLT:

3.61

LHX:

0.47

Martin Ratio

ESLT:

20.88

LHX:

0.94

Ulcer Index

ESLT:

4.55%

LHX:

12.99%

Daily Std Dev

ESLT:

30.79%

LHX:

22.51%

Max Drawdown

ESLT:

-53.77%

LHX:

-65.58%

Current Drawdown

ESLT:

-8.01%

LHX:

-5.22%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ESLT:

$17.00B

LHX:

$44.40B

EPS

ESLT:

$7.88

LHX:

$8.43

PE Ratio

ESLT:

48.09

LHX:

28.17

PEG Ratio

ESLT:

2.21

LHX:

0.35

PS Ratio

ESLT:

2.37

LHX:

2.09

PB Ratio

ESLT:

5.13

LHX:

2.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

ESLT:

$5.25B

LHX:

$21.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ESLT:

$1.26B

LHX:

$5.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

ESLT:

$502.73M

LHX:

$3.74B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESLT achieves a 49.58% return, which is significantly higher than LHX's 18.54% return. Over the past 10 years, ESLT has outperformed LHX with an annualized return of 19.60%, while LHX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.26% annualized return.


ESLT

YTD

49.58%

1M

1.55%

6M

52.87%

1Y

95.77%

3Y*

26.45%

5Y*

23.48%

10Y*

19.60%

LHX

YTD

18.54%

1M

14.73%

6M

1.50%

1Y

13.32%

3Y*

3.16%

5Y*

6.88%

10Y*

14.26%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Elbit Systems Ltd

L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ESLT vs. LHX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESLT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ESLT is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ESLT is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ESLT is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ESLT is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ESLT is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ESLT is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

LHX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LHX is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LHX is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LHX is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LHX is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LHX is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LHX is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ESLT vs. LHX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ESLT Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is higher than the LHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESLT and LHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ESLT vs. LHX - Dividend Comparison

ESLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than LHX's 1.89% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
0.54%0.77%0.94%1.22%1.03%1.28%1.14%1.54%1.32%1.57%1.63%2.07%
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
1.89%2.21%2.17%2.15%1.91%1.80%1.45%1.86%1.55%2.01%2.23%2.48%

Drawdowns

ESLT vs. LHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESLT drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, smaller than the maximum LHX drawdown of -65.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESLT and LHX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ESLT vs. LHX - Volatility Comparison

Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) has a higher volatility of 13.53% compared to L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) at 6.23%. This indicates that ESLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ESLT vs. LHX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Elbit Systems Ltd and L3Harris Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
1.93B
5.13B
(ESLT) Total Revenue
(LHX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items