PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ESIX vs. FNDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ESIX vs. FNDC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ESIX (SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF) and FNDC (Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESIX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 ESG Index, while FNDC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US. Both are passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESIX charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FNDC.

Performance

ESIX vs. FNDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

ESIX

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

FNDC

1D
-2.22%
1M
-2.87%
YTD
8.64%
6M
8.23%
1Y
22.78%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
9.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIX vs. FNDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ESIX
SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF		10.83%1.83%9.66%17.51%-13.44%
FNDC
Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF		8.64%35.65%1.38%14.92%-14.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIX and FNDC is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2022

0.70

The correlation between ESIX and FNDC shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESIX vs. FNDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ESIX
FNDC

Industrials

17.2%
25.3%

Financial Services

17.0%
11.4%

Technology

16.6%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
12.9%

Healthcare

10.8%
4.8%

Real Estate

6.9%
6.6%

Energy

6.7%
4.1%

Basic Materials

4.4%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
6.1%

Communication Services

2.9%
4.7%

Utilities

2.0%
2.6%

Industrials

ESIX
17.2%
FNDC
25.3%

Financial Services

ESIX
17.0%
FNDC
11.4%

Technology

ESIX
16.6%
FNDC
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ESIX
12.4%
FNDC
12.9%

Healthcare

ESIX
10.8%
FNDC
4.8%

Real Estate

ESIX
6.9%
FNDC
6.6%

Energy

ESIX
6.7%
FNDC
4.1%

Basic Materials

ESIX
4.4%
FNDC
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

ESIX
3.0%
FNDC
6.1%

Communication Services

ESIX
2.9%
FNDC
4.7%

Utilities

ESIX
2.0%
FNDC
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF

Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF

Often compared with ESIX:
ESIX vs. XJRESIX vs. VBRESIX vs. IWMESIX vs. FYXESIX vs. FDMESIX vs. VAMOESIX vs. DGRS
Often compared with FNDC:
FNDC vs. AVDVFNDC vs. SCHCFNDC vs. VSSFNDC vs. FNDAFNDC vs. DFISXFNDC vs. AVDSFNDC vs. DLS

Return for Risk

ESIX vs. FNDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ESIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FNDC
FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIX vs. FNDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ESIXFNDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

1.53

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

2.18

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.28

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

2.04

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

7.47

—

ESIX vs. FNDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESIX vs. FNDC - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ESIXFNDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

—

-43.22%

—

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-11.20%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-12.98%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-32.13%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-43.22%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

—

-4.48%

—

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

—

-8.42%

—

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

3.06%

—

Volatility

ESIX vs. FNDC - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ESIXFNDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

5.54%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

12.73%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

14.96%

—

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

—

16.09%

—

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

—

16.69%

—

ESIX vs. FNDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDC's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESIX vs. FNDC - Dividend Comparison

ESIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than FNDC's 3.55% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESIX
SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF		1.05%1.64%1.65%1.69%1.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDC
Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF		3.55%3.86%3.59%2.86%1.98%2.58%1.77%2.71%2.68%1.94%1.95%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

ESIX and FNDC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESIX is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIX is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDC.

FNDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 1.05% for ESIX.

ESIX is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while FNDC is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. ESIX tracks S&P SmallCap 600 ESG Index, while FNDC tracks Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ESIX and 0.39% for FNDC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESIX and FNDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer