ESIX vs. FDM
ESIX (SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF) and FDM (First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - ESIX tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 ESG Index while FDM tracks the Dow Jones Select Microcap Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESIX charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FDM.
Performance
ESIX vs. FDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ESIX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDM
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 13.86%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 30.56%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.29%
ESIX vs. FDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIX SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF | 10.83% | 1.83% | 9.66% | 17.51% | -13.44% |
FDM First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund | 13.86% | 18.64% | 13.00% | 12.76% | -11.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIX and FDM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2022 | 0.90 |
The correlation between ESIX and FDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESIX vs. FDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESIX
FDM
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
ESIX
FDM
Financial Services
ESIX
FDM
Technology
ESIX
FDM
Consumer Cyclical
ESIX
FDM
Healthcare
ESIX
FDM
Real Estate
ESIX
FDM
Energy
ESIX
FDM
Basic Materials
ESIX
FDM
Consumer Defensive
ESIX
FDM
Communication Services
ESIX
FDM
Utilities
ESIX
FDM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIX vs. FDM — Risk / Return Rank
ESIX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDM
ESIX vs. FDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX) and First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESIX | FDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESIX vs. FDM - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIX | FDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -63.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -11.32% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.08% | — |
Volatility
ESIX vs. FDM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIX | FDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 18.84% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 21.40% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 23.36% | — |
ESIX vs. FDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FDM's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESIX vs. FDM - Dividend Comparison
ESIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than FDM's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIX SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF | 1.05% | 1.64% | 1.65% | 1.69% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDM First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund | 1.21% | 1.43% | 1.56% | 1.81% | 1.80% | 1.08% | 1.68% | 1.37% | 1.26% | 0.97% | 1.13% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIX and FDM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESIX is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIX is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FDM.
FDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 1.05% for ESIX.
ESIX tracks S&P SmallCap 600 ESG Index, while FDM tracks Dow Jones Select Microcap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ESIX and 0.60% for FDM.
Find the right allocation for ESIX and FDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer