ESIM vs. RODM
ESIM (Eventide International ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. ESIM is actively managed, while RODM is passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESIM charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.
Performance
ESIM vs. RODM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIM achieves a 15.60% return, which is significantly higher than RODM's 9.95% return.
ESIM
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 15.60%
- 6M
- 15.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RODM
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 22.82%
- 3Y*
- 20.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- 9.29%
ESIM vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESIM Eventide International ETF | 15.60% | 1.26% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 9.95% | 1.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIM and RODM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIM vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank
ESIM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RODM
ESIM vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide International ETF (ESIM) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESIM | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESIM vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIM drawdown since its inception was -11.26%, smaller than the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIM and RODM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIM | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.26% | -35.98% | +24.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -2.34% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.17% | -6.35% | +4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.80% | — |
Volatility
ESIM vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIM | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.14% | 10.94% | +6.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 13.45% | +3.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 15.07% | +2.07% |
ESIM vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIM has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESIM vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison
ESIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than RODM's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIM Eventide International ETF | 0.19% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.83% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIM and RODM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ESIM.
RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 0.19% for ESIM.
They also come from different issuers: Eventide and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ESIM and 0.29% for RODM.
Find the right allocation for ESIM and RODM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer