ESIM vs. RODM
ESIM (Eventide International ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. ESIM is actively managed, while RODM is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESIM charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.
Performance
ESIM vs. RODM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIM achieves a 15.32% return, which is significantly higher than RODM's 12.67% return.
ESIM
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- 6M
- 12.23%
- YTD
- 15.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RODM
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- YTD
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 24.61%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
ESIM vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESIM Eventide International ETF | 15.32% | 1.26% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 12.67% | 1.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIM and RODM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.75 |
ESIM vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESIM
RODM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
ESIM
RODM
Industrials
ESIM
RODM
Financial Services
ESIM
RODM
Healthcare
ESIM
RODM
Utilities
ESIM
RODM
Consumer Cyclical
ESIM
RODM
Energy
ESIM
RODM
Real Estate
ESIM
RODM
Basic Materials
ESIM
RODM
Communication Services
ESIM
RODM
Consumer Defensive
ESIM
-
RODM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIM vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank
ESIM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RODM
ESIM vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide International ETF (ESIM) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESIM | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.48 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESIM vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIM drawdown since its inception was -11.26%, smaller than the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIM and RODM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIM | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.26% | -35.98% | +24.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -0.61% | -2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.16% | -6.33% | +4.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.80% | — |
Volatility
ESIM vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIM | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.36% | 10.90% | +6.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 13.46% | +3.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 14.97% | +2.39% |
ESIM vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIM has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESIM vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison
ESIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than RODM's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIM Eventide International ETF | 1.21% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.83% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIM and RODM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ESIM.
RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 1.21% for ESIM.
They also come from different issuers: Eventide and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ESIM and 0.29% for RODM.
Find the right allocation for ESIM and RODM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer