ESI vs. ALB
ESI (Element Solutions Inc) and ALB (Albemarle Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Chemicals industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, ESI returned 15.75%/yr vs 5.12%/yr for ALB. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ESI vs. ALB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESI achieves a 51.45% return, which is significantly higher than ALB's -15.65% return. Over the past 10 years, ESI has outperformed ALB with an annualized return of 15.75%, while ALB has yielded a comparatively lower 5.12% annualized return.
ESI
- 1D
- 2.61%
- 1M
- -13.63%
- 6M
- 27.91%
- YTD
- 51.45%
- 1Y
- 64.36%
- 3Y*
- 24.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.02%
ALB
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -12.43%
- 6M
- -27.66%
- YTD
- -15.65%
- 1Y
- 77.20%
- 3Y*
- -14.67%
- 5Y*
- -9.44%
- 10Y*
- 5.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $277.50M | $254.33M | $356.96M | |
| $219.65M | $285.50M | $193.75M |
ESI vs. ALB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESI Element Solutions Inc | 51.45% | -0.44% | 11.29% | 29.26% | -23.91% | 38.51% | 52.36% | 13.07% | 4.13% | 1.12% |
ALB Albemarle Corporation | -15.65% | 67.72% | -39.50% | -32.80% | -6.63% | 59.76% | 105.39% | -3.28% | -38.89% | 50.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESI and ALB is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2013 | 0.44 |
The correlation between ESI and ALB shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ESI:
$9.18B
ALB:
$14.00B
ESI:
$0.73
ALB:
-$2.33
ESI:
2.91
ALB:
2.55
ESI:
3.27
ALB:
1.85
ESI:
$3.15B
ALB:
$5.49B
ESI:
$1.21B
ALB:
$1.02B
ESI:
$335.10M
ALB:
$801.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESI vs. ALB — Risk / Return Rank
ESI
ALB
ESI vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Element Solutions Inc (ESI) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESI | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.23 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 1.64 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.51 | 4.42 | +3.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESI vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESI drawdown since its inception was -80.66%, roughly equal to the maximum ALB drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESI and ALB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESI | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.66% | -83.90% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.13% | -47.38% | +18.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.98% | -74.05% | +34.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.98% | -83.90% | +43.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.24% | -83.90% | +27.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.22% | -61.60% | +38.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.91% | -20.84% | -15.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.59% | 17.50% | -8.91% |
Volatility
ESI vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison
Element Solutions Inc (ESI) has a higher volatility of 15.63% compared to Albemarle Corporation (ALB) at 8.93%. This indicates that ESI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESI | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.63% | 8.93% | +6.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.18% | 40.59% | -2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.73% | 59.43% | -14.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.60% | 54.70% | -19.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.02% | 48.45% | -11.43% |
Dividends
ESI vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison
ESI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than ALB's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% |
ESI Element Solutions Inc | 0.85% | 1.28% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.76% | 1.03% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ESI vs. ALB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Element Solutions Inc and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ESI vs. ALB - Profitability Comparison
ESI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Element Solutions Inc reported a gross profit of 334.00M and revenue of 977.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.2%.
ALB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a gross profit of 500.97M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.
ESI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Element Solutions Inc reported an operating income of 113.70M and revenue of 977.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.
ALB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported an operating income of 233.51M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.
ESI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Element Solutions Inc reported a net income of 77.30M and revenue of 977.90M, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
ALB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a net income of 277.40M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESI and ALB have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESI has higher volatility (15.63%) compared to ALB (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESI dropped -80.66% vs ALB's -83.90%.
ESI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESI and ALB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer